These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 711454)

  • 21. Interpretation of the dose and LET dependence of RBE values for lethal lesions in yeast cells.
    Frankenberg D
    Radiat Res; 1984 Feb; 97(2):329-40. PubMed ID: 6364202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relation between lineal energy distribution and relative biological effectiveness for photon beams according to the microdosimetric kinetic model.
    Okamoto H; Kanai T; Kase Y; Matsumoto Y; Furusawa Y; Fujita Y; Saitoh H; Itami J; Kohno T
    J Radiat Res; 2011; 52(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 21160135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The RBE of 3.4 MeV alpha-particles and 0.565 MeV neutrons relative to 60Co gamma-rays for neoplastic transformation of human hybrid cells and the impact of culture conditions.
    Frankenberg-Schwager M; Spieren S; Pralle E; Giesen U; Brede HJ; Thiemig M; Frankenberg D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jan; 138(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 19828717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development, beam characterization and chromosomal effectiveness of X-rays of RBC characteristic X-ray generator.
    Endo S; Hoshi M; Takada J; Takatsuji T; Ejima Y; Saigusa S; Tachibana A; Sasaki MS
    J Radiat Res; 2006 Jun; 47(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 16819136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. RBE vs. dose for low doses of high-let radiations.
    Katz R; Cucinotta FA
    Health Phys; 1991 May; 60(5):717-8. PubMed ID: 2019506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Why it is advisable to keep wR = 1 and Q = 1 for photons and electrons.
    Dietze G; Alberts WG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 15273347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Application of microdosimetry to models of cell survival. I.
    Payne MG; Garrett WR
    Radiat Res; 1975 Aug; 63(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 1144686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lung cancer risk in mice: analysis of fractionation effects and neutron RBE with a biologically motivated model.
    Heidenreich WF; Carnes BA; Paretzke HG
    Radiat Res; 2006 Nov; 166(5):794-801. PubMed ID: 17067205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The tissue-equivalence of the Alderson Rando anthropomorphic phantom for x-rays of diagnostic qualities.
    Shrimpton PC; Wall BF; Fisher ES
    Phys Med Biol; 1981 Jan; 26(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 7243862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential absorbed dose distributions in lineal energy for neutrons and gamma rays at the mono-energetic neutron calibration facility.
    Takada M; Baba M; Yamaguchi H; Fujitaka K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 15914511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. RBE of low energy electrons and photons.
    Nikjoo H; Lindborg L
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(10):R65-109. PubMed ID: 20427859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The relative biological effectiveness of 200 Kv x-rays, 60 Co gamma-rays, 15 Mv x-rays and 15 Mev electrons on the testis of the mouse. 1].
    OKAMURA S; NAKAMURA H; KOGA M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1963 May; 23():189-93. PubMed ID: 13939792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sensitivity of micronucleus induction in human lymphocytes to low-LET radiation qualities: RBE and correlation of RBE and LET.
    Verhaegen F; Vral A
    Radiat Res; 1994 Aug; 139(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8052697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the dose calculation at the cellular level and its implications for the RBE of (99m)Tc and ¹²³I.
    Freudenberg R; Runge R; Maucksch U; Berger V; Kotzerke J
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):062503. PubMed ID: 24877837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biological microdosimetry based on radiation cytotoxicity data.
    Scott BR; Hutt J; Lin Y; Padilla MT; Gott KM; Potter CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 153(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22869817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by x-rays and selected radioisotopes.
    Hsiao Y; Stewart RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):233-44. PubMed ID: 18182699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative study of microdosimetric properties of x-rays, gamma-rays, and beta-rays.
    Chen J; Nekolla E; Kellerer AM
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 1996 Nov; 35(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 9008002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relative biological effectiveness of low-dose mammography quality X rays in the human breast MCF-10A cell line.
    Mills CE; Thome C; Koff D; Andrews DW; Boreham DR
    Radiat Res; 2015 Jan; 183(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 25536231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An alternative to absorbed dose, quality, and RBE at low exposures.
    Bond VP; Varma MN; Sondhaus CA; Feinendegen LE
    Radiat Res Suppl; 1985; 8():S52-7. PubMed ID: 3867089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differences between biological effects of high LET and low LET radiations in relation to their application in radiotherapy.
    Barendsen GW
    Radiol Clin (Basel); 1977; 46(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 601222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.