These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7116789)

  • 1. In vitro evaluation of prosthetic heart valves: anomalies and limitations.
    Tindale WB; Black MM; Martin TR
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1982 May; 3(2):115-30. PubMed ID: 7116789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation in vitro of prosthetic heart valves: pulsatile flow through a compliant aorta.
    Tindale WB; Trowbridge EA
    Life Support Syst; 1983; 1(3):173-88. PubMed ID: 6679015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro flow dynamics of four prosthetic aortic valves: a comparative analysis.
    Hanle DD; Harrison EC; Yoganathan AP; Allen DT; Corcoran WH
    J Biomech; 1989; 22(6-7):597-607. PubMed ID: 2808443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indication of cavitation in mechanical heart valve patients.
    Andersen TS; Johansen P; Paulsen PK; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Nov; 12(6):790-6. PubMed ID: 14658822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluid Dynamic Characterization of Transcatheter Aortic Valves Using Particle Image Velocimetry.
    Barakat M; Dvir D; Azadani AN
    Artif Organs; 2018 Nov; 42(11):E357-E368. PubMed ID: 30198167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study.
    Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro ultrasound characterization of a polyurethane trileaflet valve.
    Stewart SF; Burté F; Eidbo E; Kolff WJ; Yu LS; Clark RE
    ASAIO Trans; 1990; 36(3):M532-5. PubMed ID: 2252743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic Performance of Endovascular Valves as Valve-in-Valve in Small Stented Bioprosthesis.
    Kuehnel RU; Hartrumpf M; Erb M; Albes JM
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Apr; 65(3):225-230. PubMed ID: 27517167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of heart rate on the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical heart valves' prostheses (St. Jude Medical) in the aortic position and in the opening phase: A computational study.
    Jahandardoost M; Fradet G; Mohammadi H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Mar; 230(3):175-90. PubMed ID: 26786673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physiological vortices in the sinuses of Valsalva: An in vitro approach for bio-prosthetic valves.
    Toninato R; Salmon J; Susin FM; Ducci A; Burriesci G
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2635-2643. PubMed ID: 27282961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental validation of the fluid-structure interaction simulation of a bioprosthetic aortic heart valve.
    Kemp I; Dellimore K; Rodriguez R; Scheffer C; Blaine D; Weich H; Doubell A
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Sep; 36(3):363-73. PubMed ID: 23907849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the design and dynamics of aortic bioprostheses in vivo.
    Thubrikar M; Skinner JR; Aouad J; Finkelmeier BA; Nolan SP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Aug; 84(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 7098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comprehensive hemodynamic comparison and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch between the St. Jude Medical Trifecta and Epic Bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes M; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jun; 27(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24534651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
    Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hydrodynamic Assessment of Aortic Valves Prepared from Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa.
    Ramaswamy S; Lordeus M; Mankame OV; Valdes-Cruz L; Bibevski S; Bell SM; Baez I; Scholl F
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2017 Mar; 8(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 27995570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis.
    Cox JL; Ad N; Myers K; Gharib M; Quijano RC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 16077422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.