These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Transcatheter Replacement of Failed Bioprosthetic Valves: Large Multicenter Assessment of the Effect of Implantation Depth on Hemodynamics After Aortic Valve-in-Valve. Simonato M; Webb J; Kornowski R; Vahanian A; Frerker C; Nissen H; Bleiziffer S; Duncan A; Rodés-Cabau J; Attizzani GF; Horlick E; Latib A; Bekeredjian R; Barbanti M; Lefevre T; Cerillo A; Hernández JM; Bruschi G; Spargias K; Iadanza A; Brecker S; Palma JH; Finkelstein A; Abdel-Wahab M; Lemos P; Petronio AS; Champagnac D; Sinning JM; Salizzoni S; Napodano M; Fiorina C; Marzocchi A; Leon M; Dvir D Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27301396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves. Baumgartner H; Khan S; DeRobertis M; Czer L; Maurer G J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Feb; 19(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 1531058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position. Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 15144993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Experimental Validation of a Cardiac Simulator for in vitro Evaluation of Prosthetic Heart Valves. Bazan O; Ortiz JP Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 31(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 27556315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rapid Deployment Aortic Valves Deliver Superior Hemodynamic Performance In Vitro. Ai L; Chen H; Lin V; Bapat VN Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(5):338-345. PubMed ID: 29023351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vivo hemodynamics of prosthetic St. Jude Medical and Ionescu-Shiley heart valves analyzed by computer. Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K; Watanabe Y; Nose Y; Nakamura M Ann Thorac Surg; 1985 May; 39(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 3994447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Two-dimensional color-mapping of turbulent shear stress distribution downstream of two aortic bioprosthetic valves in vitro. Nygaard H; Giersiepen M; Hasenkam JM; Reul H; Paulsen PK; Rovsing PE; Westphal D J Biomech; 1992 Apr; 25(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 1583021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro assessment of prosthesis type and pressure recovery characteristics: Doppler echocardiography overestimation of bileaflet mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve gradients. Bach DS; Schmitz C; Dohmen G; Aaronson KD; Steinseifer U; Kleine P J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Aug; 144(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 22264413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Flow characteristics of bioprosthetic heart valves. Rashtian MY; Stevenson DM; Allen DT; Yoganathan AP; Harrison EC; Edmiston WA; Rahimtoola SH Chest; 1990 Aug; 98(2):365-75. PubMed ID: 2376169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The hydrodynamic function and leaflet dynamics of aortic and pulmonary roots and valves: an in vitro study. Weerasena N; Lockie KJ; Butterfield M; Fisher J; Kearney JN; Davies GA Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(7):350-6. PubMed ID: 1497926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Design of a system for the accelerated loading of heart valve prostheses. Rousseau EP; van de Ven AP; van Steenhoven AA; Seroo JM J Biomech; 1984; 17(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 6725294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fluid dynamic models as a guide to determine prosthetic heart valve diameter. Fumero R; Pietrabissa R J Biomech; 1986; 19(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 3949817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]