These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 712004)

  • 1. Multidimensional classification of normal voice qualities.
    Singh S; Murry T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jul; 64(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 712004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multidimensional scaling study of voice quality in females.
    Gelfer MP
    Phonetica; 1993; 50(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8516383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual-Auditory and Acoustical Analysis of the Voices of Transgender Women.
    Schwarz K; Fontanari AMV; Costa AB; Soll BMB; da Silva DC; de Sá Villas-Bôas AP; Cielo CA; Bastilha GR; Ribeiro VV; Dorfman MEKY; Lobato MIR
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):602-608. PubMed ID: 28965663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlates of psychological dimensions in talker similarity.
    Walden BE; Montgomery AA; Gibeily GJ; Prosek RA; Schwartz DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Jun; 21(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 703276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Psychoacoustic scaling of acoustic voice parameters by multicenter voice ratings].
    Schönweiler R; Wübbelt P; Hess M; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Mar; 80(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11320872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Listener experience and perception of voice quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 2314068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of experience on perceptual spaces when judging synthesized voice quality: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Kisenwether JS; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 24929934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multidimensional analysis of male and female voices.
    Murry T; Singh S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Nov; 68(5):1294-300. PubMed ID: 7440851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Investigation of Multidimensional Voice Program Parameters in Three Different Databases for Voice Pathology Detection and Classification.
    Al-Nasheri A; Muhammad G; Alsulaiman M; Ali Z; Mesallam TA; Farahat M; Malki KH; Bencherif MA
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):113.e9-113.e18. PubMed ID: 27105857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V.
    Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):e7-14. PubMed ID: 20430573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 11051513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual scaling of voice identity: common dimensions for different vowels and speakers.
    Baumann O; Belin P
    Psychol Res; 2010 Jan; 74(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 19034504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
    Helou LB; Solomon NP; Henry LR; Coppit GL; Howard RS; Stojadinovic A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Aug; 19(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20484704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1291-302. PubMed ID: 7962996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual structure of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and its acoustic correlates.
    Cannito MP; Doiuchi M; Murry T; Woodson GE
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):818.e5-13. PubMed ID: 23177751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the intentional voice quality on the impression of female speaker.
    Lukkarila P; Laukkanen AM; Palo P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Dec; 37(4):158-66. PubMed ID: 22616785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling of Breathy Voice Quality Using Pitch-strength Estimates.
    Eddins DA; Anand S; Camacho A; Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):774.e1-774.e7. PubMed ID: 26775221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.