These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7120463)

  • 41. Assessment of computed tomographic pelvimetry within a selective breech presentation management protocol.
    Gimovsky ML; O'Grady JP; Morris B
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jul; 39(7):489-91. PubMed ID: 7966034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessing cephalopelvic disproportion: back to the basics.
    Maharaj D
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2010 Jun; 65(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20633305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The clinical usefulness of X-ray pelvimetry.
    Ott WJ
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Apr; 27(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 7097673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A study of the use of radiological pelvimetry in a Chinese population.
    Lau TK; Leung CM; Li CY
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Jan; 77(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 9492716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Study on the cephalopelvic relationship with cephalic presentation in nulliparous full-term Chinese pregnant women by MRI with three-dimensional reconstruction.
    Li YG; Chen CL; Liao KD; Yu YH; Xu YK; Wang Y; Qiao W; Liu P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Aug; 298(2):433-441. PubMed ID: 29948169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of pelvic outlet capacity on labor. A prospective pelvimetry study of 1,429 unselected primiparas.
    Floberg J; Belfrage P; Ohlsén H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1987; 66(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 3618135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Magnetic resonance-based serial pelvimetry: do maternal pelvic dimensions change during pregnancy?
    Huerta-Enochian GS; Katz VL; Fox LK; Hamlin JA; Kollath JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-5. PubMed ID: 16731086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia.
    Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Hatab MR; Twickler DM; Leveno KJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):919-26. PubMed ID: 16260507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance pelvimetry: A new technique for evaluating the female pelvis in pregnancy.
    Liao KD; Yu YH; Li YG; Chen L; Peng C; Liu P; Chen CL; Chen RY; Zhong M; Wang Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():208-212. PubMed ID: 29685537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [A 1-year study of the management of fetal breech presentation by monitoring follow-up during second-stage labor instead of using external version, x-ray pelvimetry and ultrasonic assessment of fetal weight].
    Elmahaishi MS; Asam IA
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1989; 28(5):22-4. PubMed ID: 2697148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The role of postnatal x-ray pelvimetry after caesarean section in the management of subsequent delivery.
    Krishnamurthy S; Fairlie F; Cameron AD; Walker JJ; Mackenzie JR
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):716-8. PubMed ID: 1883799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [The prognostic importance of ultrasonic pelvimetry in anatomically contracted pelvis].
    Kramarskiĭ VA; Krasin BA
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Nov; (11):39-42. PubMed ID: 1814226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Hazards and uses of prenatal diagnostic X-radiation.
    Schussman LC; Lutz LJ
    J Fam Pract; 1982 Mar; 14(3):473-80. PubMed ID: 7061957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Efficacy of the fetal-pelvic index in nulliparous women at high risk for fetal-pelvic disproportion.
    Morgan MA; Thurnau GR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 166(3):810-4. PubMed ID: 1550146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Clinico-radiological correlation of the cephalopelvic index. Analysis of 500 cases].
    Puente J; Karchmer S; Perdomo de la Sierra A; Castañón A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1969 Apr; 25(150):397-406. PubMed ID: 5770800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. X-ray pelvimetry: useful procedure or medical nonsense.
    Campbell JA
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1976 Nov; 68(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 1011282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. X-ray pelvimetry in clinical obstetrics.
    Koroly M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jun; 57(6):763-4. PubMed ID: 7231831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The efficacy of x-ray pelvimetry.
    Barton JJ; Garbaciak JA; Ryan GM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jun; 143(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 7081347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [The importance of x-ray pelvimetry for the prognosis of pelvic dystocia].
    Iarŭkov A; Cherveniashki S; Chernev T
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1990; 29(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 2400056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Obstetric malpresentations: twenty years' experience.
    Cruikshank DP; White CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Aug; 116(8):1097-104. PubMed ID: 4721139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.