These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7120961)

  • 1. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: further experiments with inexperienced observers.
    Reed CM; Doherty MJ; Braida LD; Durlach NI
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 7120961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: identification of consonants and vowels by an experienced Tadoma user.
    Reed CM; Durlach NI; Braida LD; Schultz MC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 7087411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
    Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: discrimination ability of untrained observers.
    Reed CM; Rubin SI; Braida LD; Durlach NI
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Dec; 21(4):625-36. PubMed ID: 745365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: background and preliminary results.
    Norton SJ; Schultz MC; Reed CM; Braida LD; Durlach NI; Rabinowitz WM; Chomsky C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Sep; 20(3):574-95. PubMed ID: 904318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: improving performance through the use of supplementary tactual displays.
    Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Durlach NI; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Pemberton JC; Mulcahey BD; Washington DL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):450-65. PubMed ID: 1533433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generalizability of speechreading performance on nonsense syllables, words, and sentences: subjects with normal hearing.
    Demorest ME; Bernstein LE; DeHaven GP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Aug; 39(4):697-713. PubMed ID: 8844551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speechreading supplemented with auditorily presented speech parameters.
    Breeuwer M; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):481-99. PubMed ID: 3950202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: language abilities of three deaf-blind subjects.
    Chomsky C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):332-47. PubMed ID: 3762097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of a synthetic Tadoma system as a multidimensional tactile display.
    Tan HZ; Rabinowitz WM; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Sep; 86(3):981-8. PubMed ID: 2794251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual intelligibility of consonants: a lipreading screening test with implications for aural rehabilitation.
    Binnie CA; Jackson PL; Montgomery AA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 Nov; 41(4):530-9. PubMed ID: 994484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perception of temporally segmented vowels and consonant-vowel syllables.
    Tekieli ME; Cullinan WL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Mar; 22(1):103-21. PubMed ID: 502492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research on the Tadoma method of speech communication.
    Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Durlach NI; Braida LD; Conway-Fithian S; Schultz MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jan; 77(1):247-57. PubMed ID: 3973218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical characteristics of the lips underlying vowel lipreading performance.
    Montgomery AA; Jackson PL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jun; 73(6):2134-44. PubMed ID: 6875099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term training, transfer, and retention in learning to lipread.
    Massaro DW; Cohen MM; Gesi AT
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 May; 53(5):549-62. PubMed ID: 8332424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discovery and expository methods in teaching visual consonant and word identification.
    Gesi AT; Massaro DW; Cohen MM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1180-8. PubMed ID: 1447928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives.
    Jongman A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1718-25. PubMed ID: 2708688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of consonantal context on vowel lipreading.
    Montgomery AA; Walden BE; Prosek RA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 3560899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.