These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7120964)

  • 1. Detection and recognition masking-level differences for the individual CID W-1 spondaic words.
    Wilson RH; Hopkins JL; Mance CM; Novak RE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 7120964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Masking-level difference for spondaic words in 2000-msec bursts of broadband noise.
    Wilson RH; Zizz CA; Sperry JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Jul; 5(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 7949295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition masking-level differences for 10 CID W-1 spondaic words.
    Wilson RH; Shanks JE; Koebsell KA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):624-8. PubMed ID: 7162166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Cates WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural masking level difference for speech signals in noise.
    Johansson MS; Arlinger SD
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Jul; 41(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 12166687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial audiometry: detection of spondaic words in noise.
    Abouchacra K; Letowski T; Koehnke J; Besing J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Dec; 9(6):399-409. PubMed ID: 9865772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of interaural level differences on the speech recognition masking level difference.
    Wilson RH; Civitello BA; Margolis RH
    Audiology; 1985; 24(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 3977779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometrically equivalent spondaic words spoken by a female speaker.
    Wilson RH; Strouse A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 42(6):1336-46. PubMed ID: 10599616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
    Wilson RH; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thresholds and psychometric functions of the individual spondaic words.
    Young LL; Dudley B; Gunter MB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):586-93. PubMed ID: 7162160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spondaic word detection and recognition functions for female and male speakers.
    Cambron NK; Wilson RH; Shanks JE
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 2026291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of growth of masking functions and speech discrimination abilities in younger and older adults.
    Cheesman MF; Hepburn D; Armitage JC; Marshall K
    Audiology; 1995; 34(6):321-33. PubMed ID: 8833312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spondee recognition threshold as a function of set size.
    Punch JL; Howard MT
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3990257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.