These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Potential constitutional issues raised by the proposed amendments to the Georgia abortion statute. Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Feb; 71(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 7077199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Partial-birth abortion: the final frontier of abortion jurisprudence. Bopp J; Cook CR Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 9707939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion 1980: the debate continues. Healey JM Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again. Healey JM Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles. Noonan JT Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion and the law: the Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion. Marsh FH Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():107-23. PubMed ID: 12348324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement. Jipping TL Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment. Westfall D Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):97-135. PubMed ID: 7148834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium. Chopko ME Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinic for Women, Inc. v. Brizzi. Indiana. Court of Appeals Wests North East Rep; 2004; 814():1042-60. PubMed ID: 16479700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role. Witherspoon JP Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]