These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7121797)

  • 21. Interaction between lateralization of memory and probe stimulus in the recognition of verbal and spatial visual stimuli.
    Berrini R; Capitani E; Della Sala S; Spinnler H
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):517-20. PubMed ID: 6483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual field differences in the magnitude of the Oppel-Kundt illusion vary with processing time.
    Rothwell B; Zaidel E
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 2304816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hemispheric differences for visual evoked potentials from checkerboard stimuli.
    Pike J; Polich J
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(6):947-52. PubMed ID: 3194058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Kwantes PJ; Castles A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lateral differences in visual processing: relative vs exclusive hemispheric specialization.
    Bruyer R
    Hum Neurobiol; 1986; 5(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 3733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation?
    Sergent J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Apr; 8(2):253-72. PubMed ID: 6461721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cerebral asymmetry in visual attention.
    Palmer T; Tzeng OJ
    Brain Cogn; 1990 May; 13(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 2346639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of stimulus degradation on letter-matching performance of left and right hemispheric stroke patients.
    Wolcott CL; Saul RE; Hellige JB; Kumar S
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1990 Mar; 12(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 2341552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A corpus callosal deficit in sequential analysis by schizophrenics.
    Schwartz BD; Winstead DK; Walker WG
    Biol Psychiatry; 1984 Dec; 19(12):1667-76. PubMed ID: 6518215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Asymmetric processing in perception of apparent movement.
    Eals M
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 3601047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing the cerebral hemispheres on the speed of spatial shifts of visual attention: evidence from serial search.
    Arguin M; Joanette Y; Cavanagh P
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(7):733-6. PubMed ID: 2215884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality.
    Egeth H; Dagenbach D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 1830092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relationship between changes in hemispheric advantage during familiarization to faces and proficiency in facial recognition.
    Ross-Kossak P; Turkewitz G
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 6483173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hemispheric functioning in paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenia.
    Pic'l AK; Magaro PA; Wade EA
    Biol Psychiatry; 1979 Dec; 14(6):891-903. PubMed ID: 508882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can an analytic/holistic dichotomy explain hemispheric asymmetries?
    Bagnara S; Boles DB; Simion F; Umiltà C
    Cortex; 1982 Apr; 18(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 7187635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemispheric resource limitations in comprehending ambiguous pictures.
    White H; Minor SW
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Mar; 12(2):182-94. PubMed ID: 2340150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations.
    Kosslyn SM; Koenig O; Barrett A; Cave CB; Tang J; Gabrieli JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):723-35. PubMed ID: 2531207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hemispheric priming by meaningful and nonmeaningful symbols in language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): further evidence of a left hemisphere advantage.
    Hopkins WD; Morris RD; Savage-Rumbaugh ES; Rumbaugh DM
    Behav Neurosci; 1992 Jun; 106(3):575-82. PubMed ID: 1616621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dividing attention within and between hemispheres: testing a multiple resources approach to limited-capacity information processing.
    Friedman A; Polson MC; Dafoe CG; Gaskill SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):625-50. PubMed ID: 6218226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hemisphere and gender differences in mental rotation.
    Uecker A; Obrzut JE
    Brain Cogn; 1993 May; 22(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 8499111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.