These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7121808)

  • 1. Iohexol compared to urografin meglumine in cerebral angiography. A randomized, double blind cross-over study.
    Ahlgren P
    Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 7121808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cerebral angiography with the non-ionic water-soluble contrast medium iohexol and meglumine-Ca-metrizoate. A randomized double blind parallel study in man.
    Nakstad P; Sortland O; Aaserud O; Lundervold A
    Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 7121809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate in cerebral angiography.
    Kido DK; Morris TW; Ekholm S; Plassche W; Erickson JL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():142-6. PubMed ID: 6591738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Omnipaque and Urografin in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. A randomised, double blind study.
    Folke K; Andrew E; Laulund S; Hansen PF
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Apr; 58(688):319-23. PubMed ID: 3904899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Kieffer SA
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media versus iohexol.
    Wolf GL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():166-70. PubMed ID: 6382932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol.
    Cacayorin ED; Bernstein AD; Fruehan CT; Lee SH; Kieffer SA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 6410736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A controlled clinical trial of iohexol and diatrizoate in aortofemoral angiography.
    Egsgaard H; Hørup A; Praestholm J
    Eur J Radiol; 1983 Feb; 3(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 6341063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical testing of iohexol, conray meglumine and amipaque in cerebral angiography.
    Ingstrup HM; Hauge P
    Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 7043304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuroangiography with iohexol.
    Bryan RN; Miller SL; Roehm JO; Weatherall PT
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):344-6. PubMed ID: 6410740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB; Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Shaw D
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complications in cerebral angiography. A comparison between the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol and meglumine metrizoate (Isopaque Cerebral).
    Skalpe IO; Anke IM
    Neuroradiology; 1983; 25(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 6350922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.
    Bettmann MA; Bourdillon PD; Barry WH; Brush KA; Levin DC
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media vs. iohexol.
    Wolf GL
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S108-11. PubMed ID: 3882612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Iohexol cerebral angiography. Multicenter clinical trial.
    Kido DK; Potts DG; Bryan RN; Norman D; Pelz DM; Fox AJ; Shaw DD
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S55-7. PubMed ID: 3882617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial.
    Bettmann MA; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S70-4. PubMed ID: 3882619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.