BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7121928)

  • 1. Fetal heart rate acceleration: fetal movement ratio in the management of high-risk pregnancy.
    Arias JW; Saldana LR; Rivera-Alsina M; Ali V
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Oct; 60(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 7121928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing in preterm pregnancy.
    Devoe LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Oct; 60(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 7121929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic components of the nonreactive nonstress test.
    Ingardia CJ; Cetrulo CL; Knuppel RA; Kappy KA; Scerbo JC; Lake M; Aumann G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 7422169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antenatal fetal heart rate testing in high-risk pregnancies.
    Löfgren O
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Oct; 58(4):438-43. PubMed ID: 7197009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percent acceleration time: a new method of fetal assessment.
    Devoe LD; Castillo R; Saad S; McKenzie J; Searle N; Davis H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Feb; 67(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 3945428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of urinary estrogens, contraction stress tests and nonstress tests in the management of postterm pregnancy.
    Khouzami VA; Johnson JW; Daikoku NH; Rotmensch J; Hernandez E
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Mar; 28(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 6854549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic monitoring evidence of fetal distress in high-risk pregnancies.
    Peck T
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Mar; 24(3):103-8. PubMed ID: 7373591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies.
    Cederlind CJ
    J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal position during non-stress test and fetal heart rate patterns.
    Cito G; Luisi S; Mezzesimi A; Cavicchioli C; Calonaci G; Petraglia F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):335-8. PubMed ID: 15762962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal heart rate response to amniocentesis in cases of decreased fetal movements.
    Ron M; Yaffe H; Sadovsky E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Oct; 48(4):456-9. PubMed ID: 967384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The extent of fetal heart rate accelerations associated with fetal body movements in relation to the duration of fetal body movement].
    Gross W; Seewald HJ; Michels W
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1989; 111(20):1347-52. PubMed ID: 2588864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of the nonstress test.
    Knuppel RA; Lake M; Ingram JM
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Mar; 27(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 7086760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Description of cardiogram potentials of fetal movements in labor].
    Gross W; Seewald HJ; Eichhorn KH; Michels W
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1989; 111(13):871-80. PubMed ID: 2800773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An active management approach to the postdate fetus with a reactive nonstress test and fetal heart rate decelerations.
    Small ML; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 70(4):636-40. PubMed ID: 3627631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The significance of nonstress test from 24 to 42 weeks' gestation.
    Sato A; Chin E; Endo C; Kyozuka M; Akagi K; Saito J; Yamaguchi Y; Sato M; Liou S; Suzuki M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Dec; 36(12):2634-40. PubMed ID: 6520485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical experience of long-distance electronic fetal heart rate monitoring system by telephone].
    Pan J; Ye M; Du X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11831941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.