These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7124596)

  • 1. Reliability of assessing change with sequential coronary angiography.
    Detre KM; Kelsey SF; Passamani ER; Fisher MR; Brensike JF; Battaglini JW; Richardson JM; Loh IK; Stone NJ; Aldrich RF; Levy RI; Epstein SE
    Am Heart J; 1982 Oct; 104(4 Pt 1):816-23. PubMed ID: 7124596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms.
    Detre KM; Wright E; Murphy ML; Takaro T
    Circulation; 1975 Dec; 52(6):979-86. PubMed ID: 1102142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of variability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms on the appropriateness of use of coronary revascularization procedures.
    Leape LL; Park RE; Bashore TM; Harrison JK; Davidson CJ; Brook RH
    Am Heart J; 2000 Jan; 139(1 Pt 1):106-13. PubMed ID: 10618570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of a consensus panel in the interpretation of coronary angiograms.
    Sanmarco ME; Brooks SH; Blankenhorn DH
    Am Heart J; 1978 Oct; 96(4):430-7. PubMed ID: 696563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity.
    Rigolin VH; Robiolio PA; Spero LA; Harrawood BP; Morris KG; Fortin DF; Baker WA; Bashore TM; Cusma JT
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jul; 78(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 8712131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter- and intra-observer variability in the qualitative categorization of coronary angiograms.
    Herrman JP; Azar A; Umans VA; Boersma E; von Es GA; Serruys PW
    Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Mar; 12(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 8847451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.
    DeRouen TA; Murray JA; Owen W
    Circulation; 1977 Feb; 55(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 832349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of visual estimate with digital caliper measurement of coronary artery stenosis.
    Schweiger MJ; Stanek E; Iwakoshi K; Hafer JG; Jacob A; Tullner W; Gianelly RE
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1987; 13(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 3621336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Second reading of coronary angiograms by radiologists.
    Birnbaum LM; Filion KB; Joyal D; Eisenberg MJ
    Can J Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 22(14):1217-2221. PubMed ID: 17151771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variation in measurement of coronary lesions on 35 and 70 mm angiograms.
    Myers MG; Shulman HS; Saibil EA; Naqvi SZ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 May; 130(5):913-15. PubMed ID: 417590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Angiographic quantification of diffuse coronary artery disease: reliability and prognostic value for bypass operations.
    Graham MM; Chambers RJ; Davies RF
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 118(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 10504625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coronary angiography and revascularization: defining procedural indications through formal group processes. The Canadian Revascularization Panel, the Canadian Coronary Angiography Panel.
    Naylor CD; McGlynn EA; Leape LL; Pinfold SP; Bernstein SJ; Hilborne LH; Park RE; Kahan JP; Brook RH
    Can J Cardiol; 1994; 10(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 8111670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Variability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms by different specialists based on data from the cooperative Coronary Artery Surgery Study].
    Kemp H; Davis K; Judkins MP; Gosselin A; Kennedy JW; Cameron A; Swaye PS; Maynard C; Fisher LD
    Kardiologiia; 1982 Feb; 22(2):37-42. PubMed ID: 7069987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Left main coronary artery stenosis: angiographic determination.
    Cameron A; Kemp HG; Fisher LD; Gosselin A; Judkins MP; Kennedy JW; Lesperance J; Mudd JG; Ryan TJ; Silverman JF; Tristani F; Vlietstra RE; Wexler LF
    Circulation; 1983 Sep; 68(3):484-9. PubMed ID: 6872161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of coronary angiogram interpretation: an angiographic-pathologic correlation with a comparison of radiographic views.
    Murphy ML; Galbraith JE; de Soyza N
    Am Heart J; 1979 May; 97(5):578-84. PubMed ID: 433732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography.
    Zir LM; Miller SW; Dinsmore RE; Gilbert JP; Harthorne JW
    Circulation; 1976 Apr; 53(4):627-32. PubMed ID: 1253383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter-observer reliability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms.
    Chocron S; Etievent JP; Dussaucy A; Viel JF; Clement F; Alwan K; Neidhardt M; Schipman N
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1996; 10(8):671-5. PubMed ID: 8875177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of coronary artery stenoses by digital subtraction angiography: a pathoanatomic validation.
    Klein LW; Agarwal JB; Rosenberg MC; Stets G; Weintraub WS; Schneider RM; Hermann G; Helfant RH
    Am Heart J; 1987 Apr; 113(4):1011-7. PubMed ID: 3551569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of the quantitative angiographic measurements in the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry: a comparison of clinical site and repeated angiographic core laboratory readings.
    Popma JJ; Lansky AJ; Yeh W; Kennard ED; Keller MB; Merritt AJ; DeFalco RA; Desai A; Pacera JH; Schnabel JF; Niedermeyer V; Baim DS; Detre KM
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10A):19K-25K. PubMed ID: 9409689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of 1.5-T whole-heart coronary MR angiograms obtained with 32-channel cardiac coils: a comparison with conventional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Yonezawa M; Nagata M; Kitagawa K; Kato S; Yoon Y; Nakajima H; Nakamori S; Sakuma H; Hatakenaka M; Honda H
    Radiology; 2014 May; 271(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 24475794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.