175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7124784)
1. Using the proposed NCCLS protocol for evaluation of automated instruments.
Siegel SR; Chesler R
Am J Med Technol; 1982 Jul; 48(7):595-600. PubMed ID: 7124784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of four electrolyte instruments using the proposed NCCLS protocol for evaluation of precision and accuracy of automated instruments.
McClean SW; Elin RJ; Alling D; Chesler R; Siegel S; Utter AR; Green M
Clin Biochem; 1980 Aug; 13(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 6778632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic procedure for selection of automated instruments in the clinical laboratory.
Shaikh AH
Am J Med Technol; 1979 Aug; 45(8):710-4. PubMed ID: 484579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Communications among components of automated clinical laboratory systems].
Kataoka H; Nishida M; Sugiura T
Rinsho Byori; 2000 Oct; (Suppl 114):59-65. PubMed ID: 11215176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Analytical evaluation of an automated hematologic analyzer: Cell Dyn 3500].
Sanzari M; De Toni S; D'Osualdo A; Floriani F; Plebani M
Minerva Med; 1996 Mar; 87(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 8668289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multicentre european evaluation of the Kodak EKTACHEM GLU/BUN analyzer using NCCLS guidelines and other approaches.
Burnett D; Barbour HM; Woods TF; Vassault A; Sebille L; Bailly M; Haeckel R; Sonntag O; Bugiardini G; Motta R
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1982 Apr; 20(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 7077237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [New technology of automated blood cell differential counting].
Matsuno K; Ishizuka S
Rinsho Byori; 1998 Apr; 46(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 9594627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CAP Comprehensive Chemistry. Serum iron survey.
Itano M
Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Sep; 70(3 Suppl):516-22. PubMed ID: 707418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical chemistry analyzer evaluated by NCCLS guidelines for use in a military field laboratory unit.
Sullinger J; Garrett PE
Clin Chem; 1989 Nov; 35(11):2223-6. PubMed ID: 2582620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protocol for the evaluation of automated blood coagulation instruments (coagulometers) for determination of the international normalised ratio.
Giddings JC; Hall P; Basterfield P; Kennedy DA; George AJ; Hall R; Lamont J; Stirling Y
Med Lab Sci; 1989 Jan; 46(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 2779381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Automated instruments for clinical laboratory--its past and future].
Motegi K
Rinsho Byori; 1989 Dec; 37(12):1301-7. PubMed ID: 2693770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of serum sodium and chloride results for Flame IV-Auto Analyzer II, SMAC, Ektachem 400, and Nova 4 clinical analyzer systems.
Jacklyn CL; Ryder DI; Matte SJ; Moss MA; Dymond LC; Cousins CL; MacAulay MA
Clin Biochem; 1988 Jun; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 3390906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 4000 hematology analyzer.
Grimaldi E; Scopacasa F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Apr; 113(4):497-505. PubMed ID: 10761450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reequipping the lab. Part I: A brisk pace of renewal.
Benezra N
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1989 Aug; 21(8):28-32. PubMed ID: 10294490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician office analyzers. Do they satisfy medically useful criteria for analytical performance of laboratory tests?
Nanji AA; Poon R; Hinberg I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Jul; 112(7):757-9. PubMed ID: 3382331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Olympus AU 400 clinical chemistry analyzer.
Bilić A; Alpeza I; Rukavina AS
Clin Lab; 2000; 46(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10745974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Simplification of on-line connection of analyzers and standardization problems].
Kataoka H; Sasaki M; Kageoka T; Imamura J; Nishida M; Ichihara K
Rinsho Byori; 1997 Jun; 45(6):564-72. PubMed ID: 9306713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne vs. the NCCLS M27A protocol and E-test for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts.
Lombardi G; Farina C; Andreoni S; Fazii P; Faggi E; Pini G; Manso E; Nanetti A; Mazzoni A
Mycoses; 2004 Oct; 47(9-10):397-401. PubMed ID: 15504123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of serum magnesium concentration by clinical laboratories.
Elin RJ
Magnes Trace Elem; 1991-1992; 10(2-4):60-6. PubMed ID: 1844562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of an automated immunochemistry analyzer, the Auto ICS.
Smith MC
Am J Med Technol; 1983 Dec; 49(12):885-92. PubMed ID: 6670668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
