These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7124894)

  • 1. Blur-induced changes in the visual evoked potential.
    Berman MS; Seki S
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Jul; 59(7):556-60. PubMed ID: 7124894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binocular summation improves performance to defocus-induced blur.
    Plainis S; Petratou D; Giannakopoulou T; Atchison DA; Tsilimbaris MK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Apr; 52(5):2784-9. PubMed ID: 21228386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of blur and magnification effects on stereopsis: overall and meridional, monocularly- and binocularly-induced.
    Atchison DA; Schmid KL; Haley EC; Liggett EM; Lee SJ; Lu J; Moon HJ; Baldwin AS; Hess RF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Sep; 40(5):660-668. PubMed ID: 32776575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binocular advantage and visual processing in dyslexic and control children as measured by visual evoked potentials.
    Solan HA; Sutija VG; Ficarra AP; Wurst SA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Feb; 67(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 2336248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of induced monocular blur versus anisometropic amblyopia on saccades, reaching, and eye-hand coordination.
    Niechwiej-Szwedo E; Kennedy SA; Colpa L; Chandrakumar M; Goltz HC; Wong AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 53(8):4354-62. PubMed ID: 22669718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of random dot stereoacuity and Snellen acuity to optical blur.
    Schmidt PP
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jul; 71(7):466-71. PubMed ID: 7970562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic depth reversal stereograms.
    Rawlings SC; Yates JT
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Aug; 86(8):1462-73. PubMed ID: 542248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
    Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
    Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Impact of the method choice and the extent of correction on the development of visual evoked potentials in children and adolescents with refractive anomalies].
    Lobanova IV; Leshchenko IA; Markova EIu; Khatsenko IE
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2013; 129(4):44-50, 52-3. PubMed ID: 24137982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age and binocular advantage: A VEP assessment.
    Sutija VG; Ficarra AP; Paley RT; Zhang H; Solan HA; Wurst SA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Feb; 67(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 2336249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Objective evidence of binocular depth perception using VECP].
    Teping C; Murr G; Groneberg A
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1983; 80(4):267-8. PubMed ID: 6629248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective Assessment of Eye Dominance Using the VEP: A Pilot Study.
    Willeford KT; Ciuffreda KJ; Zikos G
    Eye Contact Lens; 2016 Mar; 42(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 25828514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective comparative study of tolerance to refractive errors after implantation of extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses with identical aspheric platform in Korean population.
    Son HS; Kim SH; Auffarth GU; Choi CY
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):187. PubMed ID: 31426775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refractive state of tree shrew eyes measured with cortical visual evoked potentials.
    Norton TT; Wu WW; Siegwart JT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 80(9):623-31. PubMed ID: 14502042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Induced Astigmatism on the Depth of Focus.
    Leube A; Ohlendorf A; Wahl S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Oct; 93(10):1228-34. PubMed ID: 27536975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binocular interaction studied with visual evoked responses (VER) in humans with normal or impaired binocular vision.
    Lennerstrand G
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1978; 56(4):628-37. PubMed ID: 735771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Depth perception, eye alignment and cortical ocular dominance of dark-related cats.
    Kaye M; Mitchell DE; Cynader M
    Brain Res; 1981 Aug; 254(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 7272771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of Monocular Spatial Cues on Vergence Eye Movements in Monocular and Binocular Viewing of 3-D and 2-D Stimuli.
    Batvinionak AA; Gracheva MA; Bolshakov AS; Rozhkova GI
    Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):1077-84. PubMed ID: 26562921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective evaluation of binocular function using the pattern reversal visual evoked response. II. Effect of mean luminosity.
    Katsumi O; Tanino T; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Apr; 64(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 3727960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binocular function after bilateral implantation of monofocal and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Arens B; Freudenthaler N; Quentin CD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Mar; 25(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 10079446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.