These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7124894)

  • 21. The effect of monocularly and binocularly induced astigmatic blur on depth discrimination is orientation dependent.
    Chen SI; Hove M; McCloskey CL; Kaye SB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 82(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 15711457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Occlusion edge blur: a cue to relative visual depth.
    Marshall JA; Burbeck CA; Ariely D; Rolland JP; Martin KE
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1996 Apr; 13(4):681-8. PubMed ID: 8867752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Binocular summation in normal, monocularly deprived, and strabismic cats: visual evoked potentials.
    Sclar G; Ohzawa I; Freeman RD
    Exp Brain Res; 1986; 62(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3956626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evoked potential and preferential looking estimates of visual acuity in pediatric patients.
    Sokol S; Hansen VC; Moskowitz A; Greenfield P; Towle VL
    Ophthalmology; 1983 May; 90(5):552-62. PubMed ID: 6877784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mechanism of binocular interaction in refraction errors: study using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.
    di Summa A; Fusina S; Bertolasi L; Vicentini S; Perlini S; Bongiovanni LG; Polo A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1999; 98(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 10947000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of Vision on Ocular Comfort Ratings.
    Rao SB; Simpson TL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):793-800. PubMed ID: 26636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Comparative Evaluation of a New Generation of Diffractive Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.
    Cochener B; Boutillier G; Lamard M; Auberger-Zagnoli C
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Aug; 34(8):507-514. PubMed ID: 30089179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of blur and eccentric viewing on adult acuity for pediatric tests: implications for amblyopia detection.
    Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 54(10):6934-43. PubMed ID: 24071956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Suppression of monocular visual direction under fused binocular stimulation: evoked potential measurements.
    Norcia AM; McKee SP; Bonneh Y; Pettet MW
    J Vis; 2005 Jan; 5(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 15831065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of defocus on multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Pieh C; Hoffmann MB; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 243(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 15660277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stereoscopic evoked responses to crossed and uncrossed disparity accompanying simulated refractive error.
    Neill RA; Dunlop P; Dunlop DB; Fenelon B; Dunlop C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1988 Oct; 72(10):759-63. PubMed ID: 3191078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual acuity in unilateral cataract.
    Thompson DA; Møller H; Russell-Eggitt I; Kriss A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Sep; 80(9):794-8. PubMed ID: 8942375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia.
    Goodwin RT; Romano PE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Jul; 26(7):917-23. PubMed ID: 4008208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adaptation to interocular differences in blur.
    Kompaniez E; Sawides L; Marcos S; Webster MA
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(6):19. PubMed ID: 23729770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Refractive error and monocular viewing strengthen the hollow-face illusion.
    Hill H; Palmisano S; Matthews H
    Perception; 2012; 41(10):1281-5. PubMed ID: 23469708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity.
    Wang YZ; Thibos LN; Lopez N; Salmon T; Bradley A
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):584-9. PubMed ID: 8942130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Binocular enhancement of the visual evoked potential in patients with Duane's syndrome.
    Sloper JJ; Collins AD
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1994; 86(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 7956685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of test proximity and induced refractive error on stereoacuity.
    Larson W
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 May; 64(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 3455201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A simple method of assessing monocular visual acuity in nystagmus ].
    Haase W; Schulz CP
    Ophthalmologica; 1982; 185(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 7122037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.