These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7127964)

  • 21. Revision surgery for failed, nonseptic total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side.
    Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Oct; (170):8-20. PubMed ID: 7127968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing.
    McBryde CW; Theivendran K; Thomas AM; Treacy RB; Pynsent PB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jan; 92(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 20048102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Wang L; Dai Z; Wen T; Li M; Hu Y
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Feb; 133(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 23124491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Total hip replacement and other orthopedic hip procedures.
    Griffiths HJ; Priest DR; Kushner DM; Kushner D
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Mar; 33(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 7871169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A simple tool for the adjustment of the guide wire position in hip resurfacing.
    Nogler M; Putzer D; Mayr E
    Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():269-71. PubMed ID: 23065803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of outcome of total hip arthroplasty based on initial postoperative radiographic analysis. Matched, paired comparisons of failed versus successful femoral components.
    Tapadiya D; Walker RH; Schurman DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Jun; (186):5-15. PubMed ID: 6723160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial.
    Stulberg BN; Trier KK; Naughton M; Zadzilka JD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():21-6. PubMed ID: 18676932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications.
    Amanatullah DF; Cheung Y; Di Cesare PE
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 20399365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding why metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties fail: a comparison between patients with well-functioning and revised birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasties. AAOS exhibit selection.
    Hart AJ; Matthies A; Henckel J; Ilo K; Skinner J; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Feb; 94(4):e22. PubMed ID: 22336981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing - a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up.
    Bergeron SG; Desy NM; Nikolaou VS; Debiparshad K; Antoniou J
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 19583540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficacy of hip resurfacing arthroplasty: 6 year results from an international multisurgeon prospective cohort study.
    Aulakh TS; Jayasekera N; Singh R; Patel A; Roulahamin N; Kuiper JH; Richardson JB
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Jun; 81(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 26280956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Residual groin pain at a minimum of two years after metal-on-metal THA with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head, THA with a large-diameter femoral head, and hip resurfacing.
    Lavigne M; Laffosse JM; Ganapathi M; Girard J; Vendittoli P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():93-8. PubMed ID: 21543697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Wagner resurfacing total hip arthroplasty: early results.
    Lapp RA; Schatzker J
    Can J Surg; 1981 Sep; 24(5):485-7. PubMed ID: 7284910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acetabular cup malalignment after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a case for elective revision?
    Mai MC; Milbrandt JC; Hulsen J; Allan DG
    Orthopedics; 2009 Nov; 32(11):853. PubMed ID: 19902880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Unsatisfactory surgical learning curve with hip resurfacing.
    Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Adams JB; Sneller MA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():89-92. PubMed ID: 21543696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ball ST; Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 89(4):735-41. PubMed ID: 17403794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a skeptic's view.
    Lachiewicz PF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():86-91. PubMed ID: 17632416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dislocation and infection after revision total hip arthroplasty: comparison between the first and multiply revised total hip arthroplasty.
    Kosashvili Y; Backstein D; Safir O; Lakstein D; Gross AE
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1170-5. PubMed ID: 21676585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conversion of hip arthrodesis to total joint arthroplasty.
    Attarian DE; Southworth S
    Contemp Orthop; 1995 Jan; 30(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 10150256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.