These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7128223)

  • 1. Standardization of inhalation provocation tests. Dose vs concentration of histamine.
    Cockcroft DW; Berscheid BA
    Chest; 1982 Nov; 82(5):572-5. PubMed ID: 7128223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeated histamine inhalation tests in asthmatic patients.
    Ruffin RE; Alpers JH; Crockett AJ; Hamilton R
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1981 Apr; 67(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 7204784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of responsiveness to inhaled histamine using FEV1: comparison of PC20 and threshold.
    Cockcroft DW; Berscheid BA; Murdock KY
    Thorax; 1983 Jul; 38(7):523-6. PubMed ID: 6612638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reproducibility and agreement of three indices of airway responsiveness to histamine in asthmatic children.
    van Aalderen WM; Gerritsen J; Koëter GH; van der Weele LT; Postma DS; Knol K
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 1989; 6(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 2927969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Slope of the dose-response curve: usefulness in assessing bronchial responses to inhaled histamine.
    Cockcroft DW; Berscheid BA
    Thorax; 1983 Jan; 38(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 6845264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propranolol inhalation challenge in relation to histamine response in children with asthma.
    Gerritsen J; Koëter GH; Vander Weele LT; Knol K
    Thorax; 1988 Jun; 43(6):451-5. PubMed ID: 2971275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Absence of a late-phase response or increase in histamine responsiveness after bronchial provocation with adenosine 5'-monophosphate in atopic and non-atopic asthma.
    Phillips GD; Holgate ST
    Clin Sci (Lond); 1988 Oct; 75(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 2461826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methacholine inhalation challenge. Practical consequences of using duplicate spirograms after each concentration.
    Prieto L; Marín J
    Ann Allergy; 1993 Jun; 70(6):487-90. PubMed ID: 8507045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in bronchial responsiveness to histamine at intervals after allergen challenge.
    Cockcroft DW; Murdock KY
    Thorax; 1987 Apr; 42(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 3616989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Airway refractoriness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate after repeated inhalation.
    Daxun Z; Rafferty P; Richards R; Summerell S; Holgate ST
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Jan; 83(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 2913134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of excessive bronchoconstriction in asthma.
    Gibbons WJ; Sharma A; Lougheed D; Macklem PT
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1996 Feb; 153(2):582-9. PubMed ID: 8564102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of PC20 histamine with the use of two different nebulizers and measurement of FEV1 and PEF.
    Iversen M; Harving H; Pedersen B
    Allergy; 1991 Apr; 46(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 2058817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing methods for assessing bronchial responsiveness in children: single step cold air challenge, multiple step cold air challenge, and histamine provocation.
    Modl M; Eber E; Steinbrugger B; Weinhandl E; Zach MS
    Eur Respir J; 1995 Oct; 8(10):1742-7. PubMed ID: 8586132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: influence of nebulizer output, particle size, and method of inhalation.
    Ryan G; Dolovich MB; Obminski G; Cockcroft DW; Juniper E; Hargreave FE; Newhouse MT
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1981 Feb; 67(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 7451782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of responsiveness to a standardized bronchial allergen provocation-Rt compared to FEV1 as measurement of response to provocation.
    Frølund L; Madsen F; Svendsen UG; Nielsen NH; Weeke B
    Clin Allergy; 1987 May; 17(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 3608140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: two techniques of aerosol generation and inhalation compared.
    Ryan G; Dolovich MB; Roberts RS; Frith PA; Juniper EF; Hargreave FE; Newhouse MT
    Am Rev Respir Dis; 1981 Feb; 123(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 7235358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bronchoconstriction due to exercise combined with cold air inhalation does not generally influence bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine in asthmatic subjects.
    Tessier P; Cartier A; Ghezzo H; Martin RR; Malo JL
    Eur Respir J; 1988 Feb; 1(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 3360091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acute exposure to sawdust does not alter airway calibre and responsiveness to histamine in asthmatic subjects.
    De Luca S; Caire N; Cloutier Y; Cartier A; Ghezzo H; Malo JL
    Eur Respir J; 1988 Jun; 1(6):540-6. PubMed ID: 3169223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of cold air on the bronchial response to inhaled histamine in patients with asthma.
    Dosman JA; Hodgson WC; Cockcroft DW
    Am Rev Respir Dis; 1991 Jul; 144(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 2064140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Airway calibre as a confounder in interpreting bronchial responsiveness in asthma.
    Dirksen A; Madsen F; Engel T; Frølund L; Heinig JH; Mosbech H
    Thorax; 1992 Sep; 47(9):702-6. PubMed ID: 1359666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.