These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7128660)

  • 1. Age, response complexity, and target consistency in visual search.
    Plude DJ; Hoyer WJ; Lazar J
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 7128660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age differences and similarities in the improvement of controlled search.
    Madden DJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7128659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of template complexity on visual search and dual-task performance.
    Bourke PA; Duncan J
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15733201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aging, task complexity, and efficiency modes: the influence of working memory involvement on age differences in response times for verbal and visuospatial tasks.
    Verhaeghen P; Cerella J; Basak C
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006 Jun; 13(2):254-80. PubMed ID: 16807201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aging and comparative search for feature differences.
    Gottlob LR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):435-57. PubMed ID: 16887782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No age differences in complex memory search: older adults search as efficiently as younger adults.
    Lange EB; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 19290742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues.
    Gottlob LR
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of age on detection of emotional information.
    Leclerc CM; Kensinger EA
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Mar; 23(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 18361668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age and the ability to inhibit distractor information in visual selective attention.
    Kotary L; Hoyer WJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 7628509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.
    Scialfa CT; Esau SP; Joffe KM
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 9783154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aging and working memory inside and outside the focus of attention: dissociations of availability and accessibility.
    Vaughan L; Basak C; Hartman M; Verhaeghen P
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Nov; 15(6):703-24. PubMed ID: 18608047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistent mapping and automatic visual search: comparing persons with and without intellectual disability.
    Merrill EC
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2004 Nov; 48(Pt 8):746-53. PubMed ID: 15494064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging and inhibition: beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention.
    Kramer AF; Humphrey DG; Larish JF; Logan GD; Strayer DL
    Psychol Aging; 1994 Dec; 9(4):491-512. PubMed ID: 7893421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adult age differences in visual word recognition: semantic encoding and episodic retention.
    Madden DJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1986; 12(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 3569387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
    Hodgson E; Waller D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Partial report, visual matching, and search as a function of cue-delay.
    Schulz T
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1989; 141(3):213-35. PubMed ID: 2631635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aging, memory and visual search.
    Kramer AF; Boot WR; McCarley JS; Peterson MS; Colcombe A; Scialfa CT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):288-304. PubMed ID: 16438921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition.
    Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 16131269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.