BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7129740)

  • 1. The effects of early treatment, lead time and length bias on the mortality experienced by cases detected by screening.
    Morrison AS
    Int J Epidemiol; 1982 Sep; 11(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 7129740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties.
    Duffy SW; Tabár L; Chen HH; Holmqvist M; Yen MF; Abdsalah S; Epstein B; Frodis E; Ljungberg E; Hedborg-Melander C; Sundbom A; Tholin M; Wiege M; Akerlund A; Wu HM; Tung TS; Chiu YH; Chiu CP; Huang CC; Smith RA; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Holmberg L
    Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):458-69. PubMed ID: 12209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A case-control evaluation of the effect of breast cancer screening in the United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer.
    Moss SM; Summerley ME; Thomas BT; Ellman R; Chamberlain JO
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Aug; 46(4):362-4. PubMed ID: 1431707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
    Hristova L; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-parametric estimation of the post-lead-time survival distribution of screen-detected cancer cases.
    Xu JL; Prorok PC
    Stat Med; 1995 Dec; 14(24):2715-25. PubMed ID: 8619110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the survival of cancer cases detected by screening.
    Walter SD; Stitt LW
    Stat Med; 1987 Dec; 6(8):885-900. PubMed ID: 3438615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
    Autier P; Boniol M
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of length biased sampling of unobserved sojourn times on the survival distribution when disease is screen detected.
    Kafadar K; Prorok PC
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(16):2116-46. PubMed ID: 19424959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of prognostic and socio-economic factors in screen-detected and symptomatic cases of breast cancer.
    Garvican L; Littlejohns P
    Public Health; 1998 Jan; 112(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 9490883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Further evidence of benefits of a (non-randomised) breast cancer screening programme: the DOM project.
    Collette HJ; de Waard F; Rombach JJ; Collette C; Day NE
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Aug; 46(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 1431712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative definitions of comparable case groups and estimates of lead time and benefit time in randomized cancer screening trials.
    Kafadar K; Prorok PC
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(1):83-111. PubMed ID: 12486753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Favourable prognostic factors of subsequent screen-detected breast cancers among women aged 50-69.
    Chiarelli AM; Edwards SA; Sheppard AJ; Mirea L; Chong N; Paszat L; Shumak RS; Oʼmalley FP;
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2012 Nov; 21(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 22273849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of screening as a public health policy: issues in design and evaluation.
    Hakama M; Pukkala E; Söderman B; Day N
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 10693068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Continuous tumour growth models, lead time estimation and length bias in breast cancer screening studies.
    Abrahamsson L; Isheden G; Czene K; Humphreys K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Feb; 29(2):374-395. PubMed ID: 30854935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicted long-term mortality reduction associated with the second round of breast screening in East Anglia.
    McCann J; Duffy S; Day N;
    Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 11161411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data.
    Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 16434585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benefit-to-harm ratio of the Danish breast cancer screening programme.
    Beau AB; Lynge E; Njor SH; Vejborg I; Lophaven SN
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Aug; 141(3):512-518. PubMed ID: 28470685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic factors of prostate cancer mortality in a Finnish randomized screening trial.
    Neupane S; Steyerberg E; Raitanen J; Talala K; Pylväläinen J; Taari K; Tammela TL; Auvinen A
    Int J Urol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):270-276. PubMed ID: 29224236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.