These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. [Reliability of the bacterial identification tests and of antibiotic sensitivity tests made with automatic methods]. Goffi M; Somenzi P; Magliani W; Menozzi MG Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Mar; 17(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 7313071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tentative direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing in urine. Gillenwater JY; Clark MM J Urol; 1996 Jul; 156(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 8648778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oxoid aura system as a semi-automated, standard antimicrobial susceptibility test method. Grover M; Dimmer S; Rodger J Br J Biomed Sci; 2001; 58(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 11575736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breakpoints in antibiotic sensitivity testing and their clinical relevance. Hamilton-Miler JM J Chemother; 1997 May; 9 Suppl 1():47-54. PubMed ID: 9248962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standardization of susceptibility testing methods. Phillips I; King A J Chemother; 1997 May; 9 Suppl 1():13-8. PubMed ID: 9248958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Criteria of time and antibiotic susceptibility in the elimination of duplicates when calculating resistance frequencies. Rodríguez JC; Sirvent E; López-Lozano JM; Royo G J Antimicrob Chemother; 2003 Jul; 52(1):132-4. PubMed ID: 12805258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Costs of diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: when does choosing the treatment regimen based on susceptibility testing become cost effective? Breuer T; Graham DY Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Mar; 94(3):725-9. PubMed ID: 10086658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro susceptibility-testing in Aspergillus species. Lass-Flörl C; Perkhofer S Mycoses; 2008 Sep; 51(5):437-46. PubMed ID: 18422914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What's the use of susceptibility testing? Greenwood D J Chemother; 1997 May; 9 Suppl 1():7-12. PubMed ID: 9248957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria isolated from animals: methods for in-vitro susceptibility testing and their suitability with regard to the generation of the most useful data for therapeutic applications]. Schwarz S; Böttner A; Hafez HM; Kehrenberg C; Kietzmann M; Klarmann D; Klein G; Krabisch P; Kühn T; Luhofer G; Richter A; Traeder W; Waldmann KH; Wallmann J; Werckenthin C Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003; 116(9-10):353-61. PubMed ID: 14526464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Susceptibility testing methods of antifungal agents. Ernst EJ Methods Mol Med; 2005; 118():3-12. PubMed ID: 15888930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro susceptibility testing versus in vivo effectiveness. Stratton CW Med Clin North Am; 2006 Nov; 90(6):1077-88. PubMed ID: 17116437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Sweden. II. Species-related zone diameter breakpoints to avoid interpretive errors and guard against unrecognized evolution of resistance. Ringertz S; Olsson-Liljequist B; Kahlmeter G; Kronvall G Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1997; 105():8-12. PubMed ID: 9435026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]