These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7130222)

  • 21. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT.
    Jones AC; Arns CH; Sheppard AP; Hutmacher DW; Milthorpe BK; Knackstedt MA
    Biomaterials; 2007 May; 28(15):2491-504. PubMed ID: 17335896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry and Image Analysis of Cement-Based Materials.
    Abell AB; Willis KL; Lange DA
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1999 Mar; 211(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9929433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. AFM-porosimetry: density and pore volume measurements of particulate materials.
    Sörensen MH; Valle-Delgado JJ; Corkery RW; Rutland MW; Alberius PC
    Langmuir; 2008 Jun; 24(13):7024-30. PubMed ID: 18503284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of pores created by laser superfinishing on osseointegration of titanium alloy implants.
    Stangl R; Pries A; Loos B; Müller M; Erben RG
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):444-53. PubMed ID: 15127391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Expanded fluorocarbon for keratoprosthesis cellular ingrowth and transparency.
    Legeais JM; Renard G; Parel JM; Serdarevic O; Mei-Mui M; Pouliquen Y
    Exp Eye Res; 1994 Jan; 58(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 8157100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sequentially Compressive and Intrusive Mechanisms in Mercury Porosimetry of Carbon Blacks.
    Pirard R; Sahouli B; Blacher S; Pirard J
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1999 Sep; 217(1):216-217. PubMed ID: 10441434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unified method for the total pore volume and pore size distribution of hierarchical zeolites from argon adsorption and mercury intrusion.
    Kenvin J; Jagiello J; Mitchell S; Pérez-Ramírez J
    Langmuir; 2015 Feb; 31(4):1242-7. PubMed ID: 25603366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neovascularization of synthetic membranes directed by membrane microarchitecture.
    Brauker JH; Carr-Brendel VE; Martinson LA; Crudele J; Johnston WD; Johnson RC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Dec; 29(12):1517-24. PubMed ID: 8600142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of mercury contact angle, surface tension, and retraction mechanism on the interpretation of mercury porosimetry data.
    Rigby SP; Edler KJ
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2002 Jun; 250(1):175-90. PubMed ID: 16290649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modeling liquid porosimetry in modeled and imaged 3-D fibrous microstructures.
    Jaganathan S; Vahedi Tafreshi H; Pourdeyhimi B
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Oct; 326(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 18684465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determination of the distribution of consolidants and interpretation of mercury porosimetry data in a sandstone porous network using LSCM.
    Zoghlami K; Gómez-Gras D
    Microsc Res Tech; 2004 Dec; 65(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 15662619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Soft porous PTFE-composite alloplasts: tissue-bonding characteristics.
    Homsy CA
    J Endourol; 2000 Feb; 14(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 10735569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bone ingrowth in porous titanium implants produced by 3D fiber deposition.
    Li JP; Habibovic P; van den Doel M; Wilson CE; de Wijn JR; van Blitterswijk CA; de Groot K
    Biomaterials; 2007 Jun; 28(18):2810-20. PubMed ID: 17367852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pore structure and surface area of mannitol powder, granules and tablets determined with mercury porosimetry and nitrogen adsorption.
    Westermarck S; Juppo AM; Kervinen L; Yliruusi J
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 1998 Jul; 46(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 9700023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modeling mercury porosimetry using statistical mechanics.
    Porcheron F; Monson PA; Thommes M
    Langmuir; 2004 Jul; 20(15):6482-9. PubMed ID: 15248740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dynamic aspects of mercury porosimetry: a lattice model study.
    Porcheron F; Monson PA
    Langmuir; 2005 Mar; 21(7):3179-86. PubMed ID: 15780002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mercury porosimetry of microcrystalline cellulose tablets: effect of scanning speed and moisture.
    Westermarck S
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2000 Sep; 50(2):319-25. PubMed ID: 10962244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new alloplastic material for ophthalmic surgery.
    Lamberts DW; Grandon SC
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1978 Dec; 9(6):35-42. PubMed ID: 745815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationship between the Size of the Samples and the Interpretation of the Mercury Intrusion Results of an Artificial Sandstone.
    Dong H; Zhang H; Zuo Y; Gao P; Ye G
    Materials (Basel); 2018 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 29382067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Synthesis and characterization of elastic and macroporous chitosan-gelatin cryogels for tissue engineering.
    Kathuria N; Tripathi A; Kar KK; Kumar A
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Jan; 5(1):406-18. PubMed ID: 18701361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.