These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7130532)

  • 1. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Tyler RS; Summerfield Q; Wood EJ; Fernandes MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):740-52. PubMed ID: 7130532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Associations and dissociations between psychoacoustic abilities and speech perception in adolescents with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Segal O; Algom D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):956-72. PubMed ID: 19064905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Wightman FL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):761-5. PubMed ID: 7130534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consonant-feature transmission as a function of presentation level in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gutnick HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1124-30. PubMed ID: 7142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Say-stay" identification and psychoacoustic performance of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson PB; Nittrouer S; Norton SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1830-8. PubMed ID: 7699164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychoacoustics of normal and impaired hearing.
    Moore BC
    Br Med Bull; 2002; 63():121-34. PubMed ID: 12324388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency resolution and discrimination of constant and dynamic tones in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Tyler RS; Wood EJ; Fernandes M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1190-9. PubMed ID: 6643841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1989; 32():1-25. PubMed ID: 2711118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal processing in the aging auditory system.
    Strouse A; Ashmead DH; Ohde RN; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2385-99. PubMed ID: 10491702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of simulated hearing loss on speech sounds perception.
    Schear JM; Skenes LL; Larson VD
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1988 Oct; 10(5):597-602. PubMed ID: 3225315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonetic identification by elderly normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dorman MF; Marton K; Hannley MT; Lindholm JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):664-70. PubMed ID: 3973237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
    Kortlang S; Mauermann M; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of auditory nonlinearity for listeners with different hearing losses using temporal masking and categorical loudness scaling.
    Jürgens T; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):177-91. PubMed ID: 21669269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners.
    Ludvigsen C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1271-80. PubMed ID: 4056221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual cues to the voiced-voiceless distinction of final fricatives for listeners with impaired or with normal hearing.
    Revoile SG; Holden-Pitt L; Pickett JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Mar; 77(3):1263-5. PubMed ID: 3980876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.