These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7130532)

  • 21. Perception of temporal fine-structure cues in speech with minimal envelope cues for listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
    Ardoint M; Sheft S; Fleuriot P; Garnier S; Lorenzi C
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):823-31. PubMed ID: 20666687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of contextual strength on phonetic identification in younger and older listeners.
    Abada SH; Baum SR; Titone D
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(3):232-50. PubMed ID: 18568981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustic cues to final stop voicing for impaired-and normal hearing listeners.
    Revoile S; Pickett JM; Holden LD; Talkin D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1145-54. PubMed ID: 7142580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Relations between perceptual measures of temporal processing, auditory-evoked brainstem responses and speech intelligibility in noise.
    Papakonstantinou A; Strelcyk O; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):30-7. PubMed ID: 21354285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.
    Davies-Venn E; Nelson P; Souza P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):492-503. PubMed ID: 26233047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception.
    Yund EW; Woods DL
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 20562624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech discrimination and hearing loss sloping to high frequencies. A phonetic approach.
    Kiukaanniemi H; Määttä T
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 7466285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identifying nonwords: effects of lexical neighborhoods, phonotactic probability, and listener characteristics.
    Janse E; Newman RS
    Lang Speech; 2013 Dec; 56(Pt 4):421-41. PubMed ID: 24597272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.
    Pichora-Fuller MK; Souza PE
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42 Suppl 2():2S11-6. PubMed ID: 12918623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recognition of time-distorted sentences by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):379-84. PubMed ID: 11206166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech competition effects on synthetic stop-vowel perception by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gordon-Salant SM; Wightman FL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May; 73(5):1756-65. PubMed ID: 6223058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of temporal waveform shape on spectral discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2074-82. PubMed ID: 8227749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Applying Rasch model analysis in the development of the cantonese tone identification test (CANTIT).
    Lee KYS; Lam JHS; Chan KTY; van Hasselt CA; Tong MCF
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S60-S73. PubMed ID: 28635504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of aging and hearing status on verbal short-term memory.
    Verhaegen C; Collette F; Majerus S
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2014; 21(4):464-82. PubMed ID: 24007209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.
    Faulkner A; Ball V; Rosen S; Moore BC; Fourcin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2136-55. PubMed ID: 1597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
    Emiroglu S; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.