These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7130536)

  • 1. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears.
    Zurek PM; Clark WW; Kim DO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):774-80. PubMed ID: 7130536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones.
    Clark WW; Kim DO; Zurek PM; Bohne BA
    Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 16(3):299-314. PubMed ID: 6401089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.
    Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):297-317. PubMed ID: 7410234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic distortion in the ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury.
    Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1481-90. PubMed ID: 3711447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
    Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus.
    Janssen T; Kummer P; Arnold W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3418-30. PubMed ID: 9637029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of the cochlear efferent system in acquired resistance to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Zheng XY; Henderson D; McFadden SL; Hu BH
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):191-203. PubMed ID: 9119763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.
    Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 77(5):2385-99. PubMed ID: 9163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intracochlear pressure in response to high intensity, low frequency sounds in chinchilla.
    Peacock J; Al Hussaini M; Greene NT; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():213-222. PubMed ID: 29945804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve.
    Fahey PF; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 3973231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of contralateral broad-band noise on acoustic distortion products from the human ear.
    Williams DM; Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):127-46. PubMed ID: 9119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Mice Above and Below the Eliciting Primaries.
    Cheatham MA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Aug; 24(4):413-428. PubMed ID: 37464091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phase delay measurements of distortion product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 in human ears.
    Wable J; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2228-35. PubMed ID: 8865631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
    Whitehead ML; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of infrasound on cochlear damage from exposure to a 4 kHz octave band of noise.
    Harding GW; Bohne BA; Lee SC; Salt AN
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):128-38. PubMed ID: 17300889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ear canal acoustic distortion at 2f1-f2 from human ears: relation to other emissions and perceived combination tones.
    Furst M; Rabinowitz WM; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):215-21. PubMed ID: 3411050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.