These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7131676)

  • 1. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I.
    Suber DG; Tabor WJ
    JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminally ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part II.
    Suber DG; Tabor WJ
    JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(19):2431-2. PubMed ID: 7131695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases.
    Buchanan A
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
    Tecklenburg N
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
    Carroll PR
    Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post-Saikewicz judicial actions clarify the rights of patients and families.
    Glantz LH
    Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10240215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.
    Albert LA
    J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
    Colabrese CA
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand "medically inappropriate" life support for incompetent patients?
    Cantor NL
    Crit Care Med; 1996 May; 24(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 8706470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient.
    Norris JA
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does it make clinical sense to equate terminally ill patients who require life-sustaining interventions with those who do not?
    Alpers A; Lo B
    JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(21):1705-8. PubMed ID: 9169898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of statutory limitations on the authority of substitute decision makers on the care of patients in the intensive care unit: case examples and review of state laws affecting withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment.
    Venkat A; Becker J
    J Intensive Care Med; 2014; 29(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 22257784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
    Thomson CJ
    Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should physicians withhold life-sustaining care from patients who are not terminally ill?
    Emanuel EJ
    Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8577):106-8. PubMed ID: 2891943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who "pulls the plug:" the practical effect of the Saikewicz decision.
    Dunn LJ
    Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):6-8. PubMed ID: 10240214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Silent decisions: limits of consent and the terminally ill patient.
    Brennan TA
    Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(3-4):204-9. PubMed ID: 3205051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision making in the care of terminally ill incompetent persons: concerns about the role of the courts.
    Mariner WK
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 6481053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The legal status of consent obtained from families of adult patients to withhold or withdraw treatment.
    Areen J
    JAMA; 1987 Jul; 258(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 3599309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.