These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7132711)

  • 1. Testing psychological theories about inference making.
    Garnham A
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Jul; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 7132711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
    Dougherty MR; Sprenger A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.
    Ash IK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):916-33. PubMed ID: 19586261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there an exemplar theory of concepts?
    Murphy GL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1035-42. PubMed ID: 27294422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trichotomous processes in early memory development, aging, and neurocognitive impairment: a unified theory.
    Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF; Howe ML
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):783-832. PubMed ID: 19839684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the natural selection of reasoning theories.
    Cheng PW; Holyoak KJ
    Cognition; 1989 Dec; 33(3):285-313. PubMed ID: 2605884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remembering in contradictory minds: disjunction fallacies in episodic memory.
    Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF; Aydin C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):711-35. PubMed ID: 20438268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition and recall-like processes in the long-term reconstruction of order.
    Whiteman HL; Nairne JS; Serra M
    Memory; 1994 Sep; 2(3):275-94. PubMed ID: 7584296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theories of Memory and Aging: A Look at the Past and a Glimpse of the Future.
    Park DC; Festini SB
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2017 Jan; 72(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 27257229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An ecological theory of expertise effects in memory recall.
    Vicente KJ; Wang JH
    Psychol Rev; 1998 Jan; 105(1):33-57. PubMed ID: 9450371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does memory affect judgment? Self-generated versus recall memory measures.
    Moser DV
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Apr; 62(4):555-63. PubMed ID: 1583584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Naïve theories of causal force and compression of elapsed time judgments.
    Faro D; McGill AL; Hastie R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 May; 98(5):683-701. PubMed ID: 20438218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotions and appraisals: can you have one without the other?
    Siemer M; Reisenzein R
    Emotion; 2007 Feb; 7(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 17352560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognition and behavior analysis: a review of Rachlin's judgment, decision, and choice.
    Stolarz-Fantino S; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Nov; 54(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 2103586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The diversity effect of inductive reasoning under segment manipulation of complex cognition.
    Chen A; Li H; Feng T; Gao X; Zhang Z; Li F; Yang D
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2005 Dec; 48(6):658-68. PubMed ID: 16483146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive structure and clinical inference.
    Hammond LK
    J Gen Psychol; 1970 Jul; 83(1st Half):107-18. PubMed ID: 5431697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SARA: a cognitive process model to simulate the anchoring effect and hindsight bias.
    Pohl RF; Eisenhauer M; Hardt O
    Memory; 2003; 11(4-5):337-56. PubMed ID: 14562867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.