These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7133380)

  • 1. Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials.
    Harter MR; Aine C; Schroeder C
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(4):421-38. PubMed ID: 7133380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial frequency-dependent asymmetry of visual evoked potential amplitudes.
    van Orden KF; House JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):1011-8. PubMed ID: 8774045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex.
    Slotnick SD; Schwarzbach J; Yantis S
    Neuroimage; 2003 Aug; 19(4):1602-11. PubMed ID: 12948715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemispheric differences in event-related potential measures of selective attention.
    Harter MR; Aine C; Schroeder C
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 425():210-1. PubMed ID: 6588832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual spatial attention to stimuli presented on the vertical and horizontal meridian: an ERP study.
    Gunter TC; Wijers AA; Jackson JL; Mulder G
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Mar; 31(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 8153250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Color selection and location selection in ERPs: differences, similarities and 'neural specificity'.
    Lange JJ; Wijers AA; Mulder LJ; Mulder G
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Jun; 48(2):153-82. PubMed ID: 9700016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interhemispheric differences in extrastriate areas during visuo-spatial selective attention.
    Macaluso E; Frith C
    Neuroimage; 2000 Nov; 12(5):485-94. PubMed ID: 11034856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From local inhibition to long-range integration: a functional dissociation of alpha-band synchronization across cortical scales in visuospatial attention.
    Doesburg SM; Green JJ; McDonald JJ; Ward LM
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1303():97-110. PubMed ID: 19782056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alpha-band electroencephalographic activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection.
    Thut G; Nietzel A; Brandt SA; Pascual-Leone A
    J Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 26(37):9494-502. PubMed ID: 16971533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lateral visual field stimulation reveals extrastriate cortical activation in the contralateral hemisphere: an fMRI study.
    Schiffer F; Mottaghy FM; Pandey Vimal RL; Renshaw PF; Cowan R; Pascual-Leone A; Teicher M; Valente E; Rohan M
    Psychiatry Res; 2004 May; 131(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15246450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.
    Mangun GR
    Psychophysiology; 1995 Jan; 32(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 7878167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hemispheric asymetry of the evoked electrical activity of the cerebral cortex to letter and non-verbal stimuli].
    Kostandov EA; Genkina OA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1976; 26(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 1274440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric representation of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects.
    Sugishita M; Hamilton CR; Sakuma I; Hemmi I
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Apr; 32(4):399-415. PubMed ID: 8047248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separate brain potential characteristics in children with reading disability and attention deficit disorder: color and letter relevance effects.
    Harter MR; Anllo-Vento L; Wood FB; Schroeder MM
    Brain Cogn; 1988 Feb; 7(1):115-40. PubMed ID: 3345265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of task difficulty on hemispheric differences in visual image processing].
    Hildebrandt H; Fresenborg I; Engel A
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(2):256-79. PubMed ID: 7497072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cooperation or competition of the two hemispheres in processing characters presented at vertical midline.
    Verleger R; Dittmer M; Smigasiewicz K
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57421. PubMed ID: 23451226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of visual-field and matching instruction on event-related potentials and reaction time.
    Kok A; van De Vijver R; Bouma A
    Brain Cogn; 1985 Oct; 4(4):377-87. PubMed ID: 4084399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional load asymmetrically affects early electrophysiological indices of visual orienting.
    O'Connell RG; Schneider D; Hester R; Mattingley JB; Bellgrove MA
    Cereb Cortex; 2011 May; 21(5):1056-65. PubMed ID: 20843899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ERP study on visual spatial priming with peripheral onsets.
    Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Mar; 31(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 8153251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemisphere-dependent attentional modulation of human parietal visual field representations.
    Sheremata SL; Silver MA
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(2):508-17. PubMed ID: 25589746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.