These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Left hemisphere advantage for classical conditioning to auditory verbal CSs: effects of nonattended extinction. Saban S; Hugdahl K; Stormark KM; Hammerborg D Psychophysiology; 1997 Sep; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 9299911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hemispheric asymmetry in conditioning to facial emotional expressions. Johnsen BH; Hugdahl K Psychophysiology; 1991 Mar; 28(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 1946881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemisphere differences in conditional learning: an ERP-study. Hugdahl K; Nordby H Cortex; 1991 Dec; 27(4):557-70. PubMed ID: 1782790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conditioning in the unattended left ear. Martin DG; Stambrook M; Tataryn DJ; Beihl H Int J Neurosci; 1984 Apr; 23(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 6480247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemispheric asymmetry and human electrodermal conditioning: the dichotic extinction paradigm. Hugdahl K; Brobeck CG Psychophysiology; 1986 Sep; 23(5):491-9. PubMed ID: 3809356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech dominance is a better predictor of functional brain asymmetry than handedness: a combined fMRI word generation and behavioral dichotic listening study. Van der Haegen L; Westerhausen R; Hugdahl K; Brysbaert M Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jan; 51(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 23149380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Left hemisphere dominance for rhythmic elements in dichotically-presented melodies. Gordon HW Cortex; 1978 Mar; 14(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 16295110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between auditory sensitivity and ear asymmetry on a dichotic listening task. Emmerich DS; Harris J; Brown WS; Springer SP Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 3362339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Different mechanisms of ipsilateral and contralateral ear extinction in aphasic patients. Bouma A; Ansink BJ J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1988 Dec; 10(6):709-26. PubMed ID: 2466867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. To remove or not to remove? Removal of the unconditional stimulus electrode does not mediate instructed extinction effects. Luck CC; Lipp OV Psychophysiology; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1248-56. PubMed ID: 26032171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrodermal responses to attended and nonattended significant stimuli during dichotic listening. Dawson ME; Schell AM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Apr; 8(2):315-24. PubMed ID: 6461724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Listening with one or two hemispheres: verbal dichotic testing after intracarotid barbiturate injection. Michel F; Mauguiere F; Duquesnel J Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 3714032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dichotic listening during forced-attention in a patient with left hemispherectomy. Wester K; Hugdahl K; Asbjørnsen A Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Feb; 72(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 2038510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cerebral asymmetry in autonomic conditioning to facial expressions: sex differences. Johnsen BH Scand J Psychol; 1993 Dec; 34(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 8303235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]