183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 713583)
1. Long-term clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the Ionescu-Schiley pericardial xenograft and the Braunwald-Cutter and Björk-Shiley prostheses in the mitral position.
Tandon AP; Sengupta SM; Lukacs L; Ionescu MI
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Dec; 76(6):763-70. PubMed ID: 713583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term follow-up of the Ionescu-Shiley mitral pericardial xenograft.
Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Tindel N; Factor SM; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):758-63. PubMed ID: 6492841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves.
Goldman B; Scully H; Tong C; Mandell R; Butany J; Azuma J; Schwartz L
Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term clinical results with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft.
Masters RG; Pipe AL; Bedard JP; Brais MP; Goldstein WG; Koshal A; Keon WJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Jan; 101(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 1986173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative analysis of long-term results with porcine-aortic, bovine pericardial and tilting disc valves].
Kawazoe K; Kawaguchi O; Kosakai Y; Ohara K; Kito Y; Fujita T
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1534-7. PubMed ID: 2586460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heart valve replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft.
Ionescu MI; Tandon AP; Mary DA; Abid A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977 Jan; 73(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 831009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and hemodynamic results of cardiac valve replacement with the Monostrut Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
Aris A; Padró JM; Cámara ML; Crexells C; Augé JM; Caralps JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Mar; 95(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 3343851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A five-year appraisal and hemodynamic evaluation of the Björk-Shiley Monostrut valve.
Nakano S; Kawashima Y; Matsuda H; Sakai K; Taniguchi K; Kawamoto T; Shintani H; Mitsuno M; Ueda T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):881-7. PubMed ID: 2023445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fatigue-induced failure of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position. In vivo and in vitro correlation and a proposed classification.
Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Factor S; Strom J; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jun; 87(6):836-44. PubMed ID: 6727407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Replacement of cardiac valves with Björk-Shiley and Cooley-Cutter prostheses: a comparative study (author's transl)].
Chiariello L; Wukasch C; Cooley A
G Ital Cardiol; 1977; 7(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 856658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current status of the Beall, Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter cardiac valve prostheses.
Brawley RK; Donahoo JS; Gott VL
Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun; 35(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 124127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Biological versus mechanical valves in the mitral position].
Shimoyama Y; Wanibuchi Y; Ino T; Terada Y; Takagi H; Furuta S; Soma Y; Yozu R; Shimizu H; Inoue T
Kyobu Geka; 1989 Sep; 42(10):806-10; discussion 811-3. PubMed ID: 2796070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The risk of thromboembolism and hemorrhage following mitral valve replacement. A comparative analysis between the porcine xenograft valve and Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial valve.
Gonzalez-Lavin L; Tandon AP; Chi S; Blair TC; McFadden PM; Lewis B; Daughters G; Ionescu M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Mar; 87(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 6700241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement].
Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F
Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
