These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Is fetal femur length a better indicator of gestational age in the growth-retarded fetus as compared with biparietal diameter? Woo JS; Wan CW; Fang A; Au KL; Tang LC; Ghosh A J Ultrasound Med; 1985 Mar; 4(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 3884834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for intrauterine growth retardation using the ultrasound biparietal diameter. Hohler CW; Lea J; Collins H J Clin Ultrasound; 1976 Jun; 4(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 818118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transverse cerebellar diameter: a useful predictor of gestational age for fetuses with asymmetric growth retardation. Lee W; Barton S; Comstock CH; Bajorek S; Batton D; Kirk JS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 165(4 Pt 1):1044-50. PubMed ID: 1951511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of fetal growth retardation by ultrasonographic estimation of total intrauterine volume. Levine SC; Filly RA; Creasy RK J Clin Ultrasound; 1979 Feb; 7(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 108295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal head circumference: relation to menstrual age. Hadlock FP; Deter RL; Harrist RB; Park SK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Apr; 138(4):649-53. PubMed ID: 6978026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A date-independent predictor of intrauterine growth retardation: femur length/abdominal circumference ratio. Hadlock FP; Deter RL; Harrist RB; Roecker E; Park SK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Nov; 141(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 6605074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Growth discordancy in twin pregnancies: a risk factor not detected by measurements of biparietal diameter. Erkkola R; Ala-Mello S; Piiroinen O; Kero P; Sillanpää M Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Aug; 66(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 3895071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of perinatal outcome using individualized growth assessment: comparison with conventional methods. Ariyuki Y; Hata T; Kitao M Pediatrics; 1995 Jul; 96(1 Pt 1):36-42. PubMed ID: 7596719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of sonographic estimated fetal weight in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation. Chervenak FA; Romero R; Berkowitz RL; Scott D; Tortora M; Hobbins JC Am J Perinatol; 1984 Jul; 1(4):298-301. PubMed ID: 6394017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A combined historic and sonographic score for the detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Hill LM; Guzick D; Belfar HL; Peterson C; Rivello D; Hixson J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 2643071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The risks of spontaneous preterm delivery and perinatal mortality in relation to size at birth according to fetal versus neonatal growth standards. Lackman F; Capewell V; Richardson B; daSilva O; Gagnon R Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 184(5):946-53. PubMed ID: 11303203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does a discrepancy between gestational age determined by biparietal diameter and last menstrual period sometimes signify early intrauterine growth retardation? Larsen T; Nguyen TH; Greisen G; Engholm G; Møller H BJOG; 2000 Feb; 107(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 10688508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The change of umbilical cord components in intrauterine growth restriction comparative with normal growth fetuses by using sonographic measurement. Somprasit C; Chanthasenanont A; Nuntakomon T J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S15-20. PubMed ID: 21294395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]