These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7138366)

  • 1. Clinical effects of closed suction drainage on wound healing in patients with head and neck cancer.
    Byers RM; Ballantyne AJ; Goepfert H; Guillamondegui OM; Larson DL; Medina J
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1982 Nov; 108(11):723-6. PubMed ID: 7138366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. THE ROLE OF CLOSED WOUND NEGATIVE PRESSURE SUCTION IN RADICAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES OF THE HEAD AND NECK.
    MCLEAN WC
    Laryngoscope; 1964 Jan; 74():70-94. PubMed ID: 14119593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Continuous high-pressure negative suction drain: new powerful tool for closed wound management: clinical experience.
    Shin SJ; Han D; Song H; Jang YJ; Park DH; Park MC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1427-31. PubMed ID: 24905942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative bacteriology of closed-suction wound drainage in contaminated surgery.
    Becker GD; Welch WD
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Apr; 100(4):403-6. PubMed ID: 2319891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Half versus full vacuum suction drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer- a prospective randomized clinical trial[ISRCTN24484328].
    Chintamani ; Singhal V; Singh J; Bansal A; Saxena S
    BMC Cancer; 2005 Jan; 5():11. PubMed ID: 15676064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Closed wound suction in surgery of head and neck. Further experiences: a portable suction unit.
    VON LEDEN H
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1963 Mar; 77():288. PubMed ID: 13997867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low- vs. high-pressure suction drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Calvo R; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Urrútia G; Gich I; Jordán M; Del Arco A; Aguilera FJ; Celaya F; Sarasquete J; Majó J; Bonfill X
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Apr; 68(4):758-66. PubMed ID: 22077914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Healing of the perineal wound.
    Hartz RS; Poticha SM; Shields TW
    Arch Surg; 1980 Apr; 115(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 7362455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Application of closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device in the treatment of high perianal abscess].
    Chen SQ; Liu WC; Zhang ZZ; Lin LY; Chen SM; Huang GL; Lin CZ; Wang L
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 22(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 31054551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Passive vs. closed suction drainage after perineal wound closure following abdominoperineal rectal excision for carcinoma. A multicenter, controlled trial. The French Association for Surgical Research.
    Fingerhut A; Hay JM; Delalande JP; Paquet JC
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1995 Sep; 38(9):926-32. PubMed ID: 7656739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of closed high-pressure suction drainage on primary healing of perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer].
    Wei WW; Wu JH; Cao ZX
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 15(4):367-9. PubMed ID: 22539383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. THE USE OF CONTINUOUS SUCTION IN GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY.
    BAIRD D
    J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1965 Apr; 72():259-63. PubMed ID: 14273106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Complications and risks of suction drainage].
    Werner HP
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1990 Feb; 36(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 2183501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Topical negative pressure versus closed surgical wound drainage: a difference in philosophy.
    Banwell PE; Ahmed S; Téot L
    J Wound Care; 2005 Oct; 14(9):445-7. PubMed ID: 16240627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ineffectiveness of closed suction drainage cultures in the prediction of bacteriologic findings in wound infections in patients undergoing contaminated head and neck cancer surgery.
    Becker GD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1985 Dec; 93(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 3937095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Relevance of wound drainage in total knee arthroplasty--a prospective comparative study].
    Martin A; Prenn M; Spiegel T; Sukopp C; von Strempel A
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 14968384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prophylactic closed suction drainage of femoral wounds in patients undergoing vascular reconstruction.
    Healy DA; Keyser J; Holcomb GW; Dean RH; Smith BM
    J Vasc Surg; 1989 Aug; 10(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 2527316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-pressure gradients generated by closed-suction surgical drainage systems.
    Grobmyer SR; Graham D; Brennan MF; Coit D
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 12542925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Closed wound suction drainage.
    Chinn SD; Burns A
    J Foot Surg; 1985; 24(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 3973352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of closed wound suction drainage after single-level lumbar laminectomy.
    Payne DH; Fischgrund JS; Herkowitz HN; Barry RL; Kurz LT; Montgomery DM
    J Spinal Disord; 1996 Oct; 9(5):401-3. PubMed ID: 8938608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.