These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7139519)
1. The nature and consequences of forensic psychiatric decision-making. Menzies RJ; Jackson MA; Glasberg RE Can J Psychiatry; 1982 Oct; 27(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 7139519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The legal basis of forensic psychiatry: statutorily mandated psychiatric diagnoses. Bloom JD; Rogers JL Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Jul; 144(7):847-53. PubMed ID: 3605396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In defense of the insanity defense. Beigel H Hillside J Clin Psychiatry; 1983; 5(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 6662497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychiatric decision-making for the courts: judges, psychiatrists, lay people? Jackson MW Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 9(4):507-20. PubMed ID: 3583530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Forensic psychiatric assessment in selected Canadian cities. Webster CD; Menzies RJ; Butler BT; Turner RE Can J Psychiatry; 1982 Oct; 27(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 7139518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The insanity defense: a difficult necessity. McGrath JJ Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 3967874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting dangerousness among the mentally ill: art, magic and science. Steadman HJ Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):381-90. PubMed ID: 6679531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The assessment of dangerousness and predictions of violence: recent research and future prospects. Litwack TR; Kirschner SM; Wack RC Psychiatr Q; 1993; 64(3):245-73. PubMed ID: 8356181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessments of dangerousness: observations in six countries. A summary of results from a WHO coordinated study. Harding TW; Adserballe H Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):391-8. PubMed ID: 6679532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Forensic psychiatric assessment in the USSR]. Friemert K Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 3237873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forensic psychiatry in The Netherlands: positioning and functioning of Dutch forensic psychiatrists. Schnitzler JG Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):443-55. PubMed ID: 6679534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The impossible dialogue between psychiatry and the judicial system: a language problem. Zemishlany Z; Melamed Y Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2006; 43(3):150-4; discussion 155-8. PubMed ID: 17294980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The insanity defense on trial. Stone AA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Aug; 33(8):636-40. PubMed ID: 7118098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The precarious practice of forensic psychiatric risk assessments. Nilsson T; Munthe C; Gustavson C; Forsman A; Anckarsäter H Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 19800123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A paradoxical outcome of a regional review board decision: a case report. Cashman FE Can J Psychiatry; 1988 Nov; 33(8):778. PubMed ID: 3203282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Competence to stand trial in Connecticut. Herron DC; Zonana HV; Crane LE Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 6640120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Determinations of dangerousness in forensic patients: an archival study. Rogers R; Sewell KW; Ross M; Ustad K; Williams A J Forensic Sci; 1995 Jan; 40(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 7876807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Center for forensic psychiatry evaluation unit services. Jackson NL New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1996; (69):81-8. PubMed ID: 8935827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Components of dangerousness: legal standard in civil commitment. Hiday VA; Markell SJ Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 7275438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]