These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7139519)
21. Further comments on the insanity defense in the aftermath of the Hinckley trial. Halpern AL Psychiatr Q; 1984; 56(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 6522530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The increasing influence of risk assessment on forensic patient review board decisions. Hilton NZ; Simpson AI; Ham E Psychol Serv; 2016 Aug; 13(3):223-231. PubMed ID: 27504642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Changes to the Criminal Code provisions for mentally disordered offenders and their implications for Canadian psychiatry. Davis S Can J Psychiatry; 1993 Mar; 38(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 8467438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The expert witness in forensic psychiatry. Chaplow DG; Peters JL; Kydd RR Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 1476528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Insanity defense continues to draw attention in Washington, state capitols. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1983 Jan; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6826158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Emerging problems for staff associated with the release of potentially dangerous forensic patients. Miller RD; Doren DM; Van Rybroek G; Maier GJ Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(4):309-20. PubMed ID: 3233348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The dangerousness criterion for civil commitment: the problem and a possible solution. Brouillette MJ; Paris J Can J Psychiatry; 1991 May; 36(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 1868422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors associated with the diversion of mentally disordered offenders. Davis S Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 7841510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Fitness to stand trial Interview Test: how four professions rate videotaped fitness interviews. Roesch R; Jackson MA; Sollner R; Eaves D; Glackman W; Webster CD Int J Law Psychiatry; 1984; 7(2):115-31. PubMed ID: 6530321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. New directions in the assessment of dangerousness of the mentally ill. Appelbaum PS Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol; 1994; 48 Suppl():77-83. PubMed ID: 7799547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The insanity defense: the case for abolition. Perr IN Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 3967873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Partial insanity: when the judiciary and the psychiatric world collide. Altmark D; Sigal M; Gelkopf M Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1995; 32(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 7558755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law. Gutheil TG; Mills MJ Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of competency to stand trial: contribution of demographics, type of offense, clinical characteristics, and psycholegal ability. Nicholson RA; Johnson WG Int J Law Psychiatry; 1991; 14(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 1864694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Female follies: the forensic psychiatric assessment of women defendants. Menzies RJ; Chunn DE; Webster CD Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 1587653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders. Dolan B Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 16575810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]