These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 713979)

  • 1. Determination of radiographic screen-film system characteristic curve and its gradient by use of a curve-smoothing technique.
    Chan HP; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 713979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physical characteristics of modern radiographic screen-film systems.
    Rao GU; Fatouros PP; James AE
    Invest Radiol; 1978; 13(5):460-9. PubMed ID: 753799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 3974523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic mottle: a comprehensive theory.
    Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(5):656-67. PubMed ID: 7155067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Theoretical considerations of effects of x-ray film-screen characteristics on threshold detectability of small low-contrast objects.
    Lassen M; Bloch P
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 683154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling guided wave propagation in functionally graded plates by state-vector formalism and the Legendre polynomial method.
    Gao J; Lyu Y; Zheng M; Liu M; Liu H; Wu B; He C
    Ultrasonics; 2019 Nov; 99():105953. PubMed ID: 31445204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical note. Evaluation of a new screen/film combination.
    Evans AL; Davison M; McLellan J; James WB
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Oct; 48(574):858-9. PubMed ID: 1191907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs.
    Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Lanhede B; Almén A; Sandborg M; McVey G; Mattsson S; Panzer W; Besjakov J; Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Alm Carlsson G; Dance DR; Tylén U; Zankl M
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 77(915):204-15. PubMed ID: 15020361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Techniques to improve the accuracy of presampling MTF measurement in digital X-ray imaging based on constrained spline regression.
    Zhou Z; Zhu Q; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ma W; Gao F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 61(4):1339-49. PubMed ID: 24658257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy absorbed in calcium tungstate x-ray screens.
    Shuping RE; Judy PF
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 882059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physics overview of screen-film radiography.
    Ritenour ER
    Radiographics; 1996 Jul; 16(4):903-16. PubMed ID: 8835979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pinhole cameras: artifacts modifications, and recording of pinhole images of screen-film systems.
    Gray JE; Trefler M
    Radiol Technol; 1980; 52(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 7280211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The dependence of radiographic mottle on beam quality.
    Barnes GT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Nov; 127(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 973671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normalized sensitometric curves for the verification of hybrid IMRT treatment plans with multiple energies.
    Georg D; Kroupa B; Winkler P; Pötter R
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1142-50. PubMed ID: 12852539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The effect of technical parameters on diagnostic quality].
    Brandt GA
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2018801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The application of fast screen-film systems to excretory urography.
    Stables DP; Rossi RP; Caruthers SB; Anderson N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Apr; 128(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 403791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interinstitutional variations of sensitometric curves of radiographic dosimetric films.
    Bos LJ; Danciu C; Cheng CW; Brugmans MJ; van der Horst A; Minken A; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1772-80. PubMed ID: 12201424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of developer temperature changes on the sensitometric properties of direct exposure and screen-film imaging systems.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 2599232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 5. Characteristic curves of II-TV digital systems.
    Fujita H; Doi K; Giger ML; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 3951404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.