These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7140095)
1. Structural weakening of layered acrylic bone cement. Black JD; Greenwald AS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982; (171):94-6. PubMed ID: 7140095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro study of the efficacy of acrylic bone cement loaded with supplementary amounts of gentamicin: effect on mechanical properties, antibiotic release, and biofilm formation. Dunne N; Hill J; McAfee P; Todd K; Kirkpatrick R; Tunney M; Patrick S Acta Orthop; 2007 Dec; 78(6):774-85. PubMed ID: 18236183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty. Ries MD; Young E; Al-Marashi L; Goldstein P; Hetherington A; Petrie T; Pruitt L Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 16039712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels. Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical properties of bone cement with addition of cefuroxime antibiotic. Mohd Fuad D; Masbah O; Shahril Y; Jamari S; Norhamdan MY; Sahrim SH Med J Malaysia; 2006 Feb; 61 Suppl A():27-9. PubMed ID: 17042225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antibiotics in acrylic bone cement. In vitro studies. Welch A J Biomed Mater Res; 1978 Sep; 12(5):679-700. PubMed ID: 701303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structural degradation of acrylic bone cements due to in vivo and simulated aging. Hughes KF; Ries MD; Pruitt LA J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 May; 65(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 12734804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monomer leakage from polymerizing acrylic bone cement. An in vitro study on the influence of speed and duration of mixing, cement volume and surface area. Linder LG; Harthon L; Kullberg L Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1976 Sep; (119):242-9. PubMed ID: 954318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of bleeding on the cement-bone interface. An experimental study. Majkowski RS; Bannister GC; Miles AW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):293-7. PubMed ID: 8119032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of various vacuum mixing systems and bone cements as regards reliability, porosity and bending strength. Mau H; Schelling K; Heisel C; Wang JS; Breusch SJ Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Apr; 75(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15180231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro testing of chitosan in gentamicin-loaded bone cement: no antimicrobial effect and reduced mechanical performance. Dunne N; Buchanan F; Hill J; Newe C; Tunney M; Brady A; Walker G Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 19085505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature. Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Augmentation of acrylic bone cement with multiwall carbon nanotubes. Marrs B; Andrews R; Rantell T; Pienkowski D J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 May; 77(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 16392130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness. Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 15961203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup. Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of the optimum loading of an antibiotic powder in an acrylic bone cement: gentamicin sulfate in SmartSet HV. Lewis G; Janna S Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 16929440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative influence of composition and viscosity of acrylic bone cement on its apparent fracture toughness. Lewis G Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10950202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant. Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical distribution of the fatigue strength of porous bone cement. Hoey DA; Taylor D Biomaterials; 2009 Oct; 30(31):6309-17. PubMed ID: 19699519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components]. Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]