These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7140152)

  • 21. Relation between Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk: Considering BMI, Compressed Breast Thickness and Age of Women in Tabriz, Iran.
    Mehnati P; Alizadeh H; Hoda H
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(4):2259-63. PubMed ID: 27221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changing emphasis in breast diagnosis: the surgeon's role in evaluating mammographic abnormalities.
    Sterns EE
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 184(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 9060928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammographic changes after reduction mammoplasty.
    Miller CL; Feig SA; Fox JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jul; 149(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 3495989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
    Liaparinos P; Bliznakova K
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
    O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Mammography after breast-preserving therapy of breast cancer].
    Dengel H; Leibersperger H; Glatt E; Reisner K; Haase W
    Rofo; 1987 May; 146(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 3035637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and mammographic densities.
    Boyd NF; Connelly P; Byng J; Yaffe M; Draper H; Little L; Jones D; Martin LJ; Lockwood G; Tritchler D
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1995; 4(7):727-33. PubMed ID: 8672989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic appearance.
    Leibman AJ; Lewis M; Kruse B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Feb; 160(2):263-5. PubMed ID: 8424330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Primary inflammatory carcinoma of the breast: retrospective review of mammographic findings.
    Kushwaha AC; Whitman GJ; Stelling CB; Cristofanilli M; Buzdar AU
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Feb; 174(2):535-8. PubMed ID: 10658737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mammography with and without radiolucent positioning sheets: Comparison of projected breast area, pain experience, radiation dose and technical image quality.
    Timmers J; Voorde MT; Engen RE; Landsveld-Verhoeven Cv; Pijnappel R; Greve KD; Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1903-9. PubMed ID: 26272030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
    de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Skin thickness changes in normal aging skin.
    Branchet MC; Boisnic S; Frances C; Robert AM
    Gerontology; 1990; 36(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 2384222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammographic features of breast tuberculosis: the skin bulge and sinus tract sign.
    Makanjuola D; Murshid K; Al Sulaimani S; Al Saleh M
    Clin Radiol; 1996 May; 51(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 8641100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimation of the breast skin-line in mammograms using multidirectional Gabor filters.
    Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangeri F; Pepe ML; Rangayyan RM
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1870-81. PubMed ID: 24209932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of fixed and variable kVp technique protocols for film-screen mammography.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 73(870):613-26. PubMed ID: 10911785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is Individualizing Breast Compression during Mammography useful? - Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast.
    Feder K; Grunert JH
    Rofo; 2017 Jan; 189(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 28002858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump.
    Dennis MA; Parker SH; Klaus AJ; Stavros AT; Kaske TI; Clark SB
    Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):186-91. PubMed ID: 11274555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Apparent ipsilateral decrease in breast size at mammography: a sign of infiltrating lobular carcinoma.
    Harvey JA; Fechner RE; Moore MM
    Radiology; 2000 Mar; 214(3):883-9. PubMed ID: 10715063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk factors for breast cancer in women undergoing mammography.
    Reuter KL; Baker SP; Krolikowski FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 1729780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mammographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection.
    Carvajal J; Patiño JH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19083521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.