These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7141137)

  • 1. Effects of audiometric configuration on speech-band thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss subjects.
    Surr RK; Seidman JH; Schwartz DM; Mueller HG
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(5):246-50. PubMed ID: 7141137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kiessling J; Leifholz M; Unkel S; Pons-Kühnemann J; Jespersen CT; Pedersen JN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 25597462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audiometric Thresholds: Stimulus Considerations in Sound Field and Under Earphones.
    Norrix LW; Anderson A
    Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 26650376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception.
    Andrade KC; Menezes Pde L; Carnaúba AT; Rodrigues RG; Leal Mde C; Pereira LD
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2013 Jun; 68(6):815-9. PubMed ID: 23778471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of multi-channel auditory steady-state response in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Chen PR; Hsu CJ; Wu HP
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jan; 123(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18452631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Audiometric Thresholds and Speech Perception Sentence Test in Adults and Elderly After Cochlear Implantation.
    Carvalho GM; Santos MD; Pauna HF; Guimarães AC; Curi SB; Jeronymo D; Porto PR; Bianchini WA; Castilho AM; Sartorato EL
    Curr Aging Sci; 2016; 9(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 27001711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing deterioration in patients with a non-growing vestibular schwannoma.
    Graamans K; Van Dijk JE; Janssen LW
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 12625573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Serial audiometry in a clinical trial of AIED treatment.
    Niparko JK; Wang NY; Rauch SD; Russell GB; Espeland MA; Pierce JJ; Bowditch S; Masuda A; Gulya AJ; Gantz BJ; Hughes GB; Brookhouser PE; Hannley MT; Telian SA; Harris JP;
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):908-17. PubMed ID: 16151337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Judgement of disproportionate loss between Mandarin monosyllable discrimination and pure tone hearing thresholds].
    Li JH; Xi X; Zhao Y; Ji F; Chen AT; Yang WY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 21055054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulation of sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Gagné JP; Erber NP
    Ear Hear; 1987 Aug; 8(4):232-43. PubMed ID: 3653537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between pure-tone and speech loudness discomfort levels among hearing-impaired subjects.
    Beattie RC; Boyd RL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 May; 51(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3702359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
    Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting speech discrimination from the audiometric thresholds.
    Yoshioka P; Thornton AR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):814-27. PubMed ID: 7442214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variable degrees of hearing impairment in a Dutch DFNX4 (DFN6) family.
    Weegerink NJ; Huygen PL; Schraders M; Kremer H; Pennings RJ; Kunst HP
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):167-77. PubMed ID: 21893181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiological evaluation of affected members from a Dutch DFNA8/12 (TECTA) family.
    Plantinga RF; Cremers CW; Huygen PL; Kunst HP; Bosman AJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17136632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of hearing thresholds obtained from the rising portion of the audiogram in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Humes LE; Tharpe AM; Bratt GW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 27(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 6738031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram.
    Gorga MP; Worthington DW; Reiland JK; Beauchaine KA; Goldgar DE
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 3996784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing pure-, pulsed, and warbled tone thresholds in adults at 3000 and 6000 Hz.
    Franklin CA; Franklin TC; Franklin JL
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 20(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 21474558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.