These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7141143)

  • 1. Relationship between the calibration tone and speech volume unit (VU) levels for some commercially available test tapes.
    Edgerton BJ; Beattie RC; Helmerich LF
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(5):280-3. PubMed ID: 7141143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amplitude (vu and rms) and Temporal (msec) Measures of Two Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 Recordings.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):346-54. PubMed ID: 25879239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model of the VU (volume-unit) meter, with speech applications.
    Lobdell BE; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):279-85. PubMed ID: 17297783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of vu-meter-based and rms-based calibration of speech levels.
    Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):EL97-9. PubMed ID: 19739705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of electromagnetic characteristics of the Willeford Central Auditory Processing Test Battery.
    Shea SL; Raffin MJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 6865375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter: On the use of audio tape cassettes in speech audiometry.
    Niemoeller AF; Harrison CE; Grason RL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1974 May; 39(2):229-30. PubMed ID: 4825815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of compact disk recording protocols on reliability and comparability of speech audiometry outcomes: acoustic analysis.
    Di Berardino F; Tognola G; Paglialonga A; Alpini D; Grandori F; Cesarani A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Aug; 124(8):859-63. PubMed ID: 20441674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.
    Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contour test of loudness perception.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Taylor IM; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):388-400. PubMed ID: 9360862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of the Tillman-Olsen procedure for determination of spondee threshold using recorded and live voice presentations.
    Beattie RC; Forrester PW; Ruby BK
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 845071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between pure-tone and speech loudness discomfort levels among hearing-impaired subjects.
    Beattie RC; Boyd RL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 May; 51(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3702359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative speech audiometry examinations with compact disk and cassette tape].
    Doerr L
    HNO; 1994 Aug; 42(8):493-8. PubMed ID: 7960952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation of the Auditec of St. Louis recordings of the Central Institute for the Deaf spondees.
    Beattie RC; Edgerton BJ; Svihovec DV
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(3):97-101. PubMed ID: 1228167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduction of observer bias in reading speech levels with a VU meter.
    Levitt H; Bricker PD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Jun; 47(6):1583-7. PubMed ID: 5430779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the calibration of two commercially recorded versions of CID auditory test W-22.
    Gengel RW; Kupperman GL
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 7409362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of digitized speech materials in audiological research.
    Kamm C; Carterette EC; Morgan DE; Dirks DD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):709-21. PubMed ID: 7442206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective loudness level measurements and equal loudness contours in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).
    Finneran JJ; Schlundt CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3124-36. PubMed ID: 22087941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal integration of loudness under partial masking.
    Florentine M; Buus S; Robinson M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):999-1007. PubMed ID: 9714919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electroacoustic calibration for sound field warble tone thresholds.
    Cox RM; McCormick VA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1987 Nov; 52(4):388-92. PubMed ID: 3669633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.