These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7141831)
1. Urography with low-osmolality contrast media: comparative urinary excretion of Iopamidol, Hexabrix, and diatrizoate. Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Boylan L Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(5):494-500. PubMed ID: 7141831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Excretion of urographic contrast media. I. Iohexol and other media during free urine flow in the rabbit. Sjöberg S; Almén T; Golman K Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():93-8. PubMed ID: 6267900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical comparison of Hexabrix, iopamidol, and Urografin-60 in whole body computed tomography. Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Kormano M Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S372-5. PubMed ID: 6511276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of iopamidol, ioxaglate, and diatrizoate during coronary arteriography in dogs. Thomson KR; Evill CA; Fritzsche J; Benness GT Invest Radiol; 1980; 15(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 7399847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of diatrizoate, iopamidol, and ioxaglate for arterial portography. An experimental study in normal dogs and dogs with portal hypertension. Burgener FA; Gutierrez OH Invest Radiol; 1985 Jul; 20(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 4044182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of diatrizoate, iopamidol, and ioxaglate for the contrast enhancement of experimental hepatic tumors in CT. Burgener FA; Steinmetz SD Invest Radiol; 1985 Sep; 20(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 4066232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the side-effects of low-osmolar contrast media in intravenous urography. Foord KD; Kaye B; Howard J; Cumberland DC Clin Radiol; 1985 Jul; 36(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 4064528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Low osmolality contrast media in peripheral arteriography--clinical comparison of ioxaglate, iopamidol, iohexol and diatrizoate]. Tajima H Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Nov; 45(11):1407-20. PubMed ID: 4094879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. CT-determined canine kidney and urine iodine concentration following intravenous administration of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide, iopamidol, and sodium ioxaglate. Brennan RE; Rapoport S; Weinberg I; Pollack HM; Curtis JA Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 7076442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative study of 2 contrast media with low osmolarity in pediatric angiocardiography]. Hoeffel JC; Donze B; Worms AM; Lostette Y Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):712-3. PubMed ID: 6367613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of five different contrast agents on serum complement and calcium levels after excretory urography. Freyria AM; Pinet A; Belleville J; Eloy R; Traeger J J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1982 Apr; 69(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 7069076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative trial of sodium meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) and iopamidol (Niopam) for cerebral angiography. Molyneux AJ; Sheldon PW; Yates DA Br J Radiol; 1982 Dec; 55(660):881-4. PubMed ID: 6756533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proteinuria following nephroangiography. VII. Comparison between ionic monomeric, monoacidic dimeric and non-ionic contrast media in the dog. Törnquist C; Almén T; Golman K; Holtås S Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():49-52. PubMed ID: 6267893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Excretion of contrast media by the immature rabbit. Comparison of Renografin and Iopamidol. Rosenbaum DM; Caldicott WJ Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6533102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical use of low osmolar roentgen contrast media]. Taenzer V Rontgenpraxis; 1984 Oct; 37(10):357-61. PubMed ID: 6505858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Plasma osmolality, iodine concentration and urographic images following high and low osmolar contrast media. Todd AW; Naisby GP; Owen JP; Smith PA; Butler TJ; Kelly PJ; Murthy LN; Robson JY; Laker MF Clin Radiol; 1991 May; 43(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 2036759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen: effect of contrast medium and body weight. Kormano M; Partanen K; Soimakallio S; Kivimäki T Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):364-7. PubMed ID: 6618827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]