These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7142532)

  • 1. Effects of premilking udder preparation on environmental bacterial contamination of milk.
    Galton DM; Adkinson RW; Thomas CV; Smith TW
    J Dairy Sci; 1982 Aug; 65(8):1540-3. PubMed ID: 7142532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of premilking udder preparation on bacterial population, sediment, and iodine residue in milk.
    Galton DM; Petersson LG; Merrill WG; Bandler DK; Shuster DE
    J Dairy Sci; 1984 Nov; 67(11):2580-9. PubMed ID: 6520268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Premilking udder hygiene.
    Pankey JW
    J Dairy Sci; 1989 May; 72(5):1308-12. PubMed ID: 2745833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of udder preparations on intramammary infections.
    Galton DM; Peterson LG; Merrill WG
    J Dairy Sci; 1988 May; 71(5):1417-21. PubMed ID: 3397430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of different premilking manual teat-cleaning methods on bacterial spores in milk.
    Magnusson M; Christiansson A; Svensson B; Kolstrup C
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Oct; 89(10):3866-75. PubMed ID: 16960062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of 2 different premilking teat sanitation routines on reduction of bacterial counts on teat skin of cows on commercial dairy farms.
    Baumberger C; Guarín JF; Ruegg PL
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):2915-2929. PubMed ID: 26898276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The association between bulk tank milk analysis for raw milk quality and on-farm management practices.
    Elmoslemany AM; Keefe GP; Dohoo IR; Wichtel JJ; Stryhn H; Dingwell RT
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Jun; 95(1-2):32-40. PubMed ID: 20381889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without manual forestripping, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times daily.
    Wieland M; Virkler PD; Weld A; Melvin JM; Wettstein MR; Oswald MF; Geary CM; Watters RD; Lynch R; Nydam DV
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9548-9560. PubMed ID: 32828498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of premilking teat preparation on spores of anaerobes, bacteria, and iodine residues in milk.
    Rasmussen MD; Galton DM; Petersson LG
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Aug; 74(8):2472-8. PubMed ID: 1918525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cleanliness scores as indicator of Klebsiella exposure in dairy cows.
    Munoz MA; Bennett GJ; Ahlström C; Griffiths HM; Schukken YH; Zadoks RN
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Oct; 91(10):3908-16. PubMed ID: 18832213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Premilking teat disinfection: is it worthwhile in pasture-grazed dairy herds?
    Morton JM; Penry JF; Malmo J; Mein GA
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7525-37. PubMed ID: 25282424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of an automatic postmilking teat dipping system on new intramammary infections and iodine in milk.
    Galton DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Jan; 87(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 14765830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in distances among teats of Holstein cows: implications for automated milking.
    Miller RH; Fulton LA; Erez B; Williams WF; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Jul; 78(7):1456-62. PubMed ID: 7593838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of season, milking routine and cow cleanliness on bacterial and somatic cell counts of bulk tank milk.
    Zucali M; Bava L; Tamburini A; Brasca M; Vanoni L; Sandrucci A
    J Dairy Res; 2011 Nov; 78(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 21843397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical note: Effects of attachment of hind teats before cleaning and attachment of front teats on milking characteristics in automatic milking systems.
    Besier J; Schüpbach-Regula G; Wellnitz O; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):3091-3095. PubMed ID: 28161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Teat tissue reactions to milking: effects of vacuum level.
    Hamann J; Mein GA; Wetzel S
    J Dairy Sci; 1993 Apr; 76(4):1040-6. PubMed ID: 8486836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Premilking teat preparation for Australian pasture-based cows milked by an automated milking system.
    Davis KL; Fulkerson WJ; Garcia SC; Dickeson D; Barchia IM
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jul; 91(7):2604-9. PubMed ID: 18565919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual detection of technical success and effectiveness of teat cleaning in two automatic milking systems.
    Hovinen M; Aisla AM; Pyörälä S
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3354-62. PubMed ID: 16107426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting milk flow traits in dairy cows: results of a field study.
    Sandrucci A; Tamburini A; Bava L; Zucali M
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Mar; 90(3):1159-67. PubMed ID: 17297090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of manual forestripping on milking performance of Holstein dairy cows.
    Wagner AM; Ruegg PL
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Apr; 85(4):804-9. PubMed ID: 12018426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.