These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7142635)
1. Accommodative facility: a study of young adults. Garzia RP; Richman JE J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Oct; 53(10):821-5. PubMed ID: 7142635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: part III. Masked assessment of the relation between visual symptoms and binocular test results in school children and adults. Wick B; Gall R; Yothers T Optometry; 2002 Mar; 73(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 12365701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation and correlation of clinical tests of accommodative function in a sample of school-age children. Jackson TW; Goss DA J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Nov; 62(11):857-66. PubMed ID: 1813515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relation between accommodative facility and general binocular dysfunction. García A; Cacho P; Lara F; Megías R Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Mar; 20(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 10829131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The symptomatic patient with normal phorias at distance and near: what tests detect a binocular vision problem? Gall R; Wick B Optometry; 2003 May; 74(5):309-22. PubMed ID: 12795318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: part II. Development of an amplitude-scaled test. Yothers T; Wick B; Morse SE Optometry; 2002 Feb; 73(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 12365715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: Part 1. A critical appraisal of the literature. Wick B; Yothers TL; Jiang BC; Morse SE Optometry; 2002 Jan; 73(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 12363234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accommodative response in children and young adults using dynamic retinoscopy. Leat SJ; Gargon JL Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Sep; 16(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 8944182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of accommodative facility using MEM retinoscopy. Gallaway M; Scheiman M J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Jan; 61(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 2319091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exotropia associated with defective accommodation. Rutstein RP; Daum KM J Am Optom Assoc; 1987 Jul; 58(7):548-54. PubMed ID: 3668152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of the test parameters in the clinical assessment of accommodative facility. Siderov J; Johnston AW Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jul; 67(7):551-7. PubMed ID: 2402405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Win-Hall DM; Ostrin LA; Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 17873774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses. Jiang BC; Tea YC; O'Donnell D Optometry; 2007 Mar; 78(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 17321462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The minimum test battery to screen for binocular vision anomalies: report 3 of the BAND study. Hussaindeen JR; Rakshit A; Singh NK; Swaminathan M; George R; Kapur S; Scheiman M; Ramani KK Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):281-287. PubMed ID: 29150866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of fogging lenses and cycloplegia on open-field automatic refraction. Queirós A; González-Méijome J; Jorge J Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 18565095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]