These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7143265)

  • 1. The effect of rating scale descriptors on hypnotic depth reports.
    Radtke HL; Spanos NP
    J Psychol; 1982 Jul; 111(2d Half):235-45. PubMed ID: 7143265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suggested visual hallucinations in and out of hypnosis.
    Mazzoni G; Rotriquenz E; Carvalho C; Vannucci M; Roberts K; Kirsch I
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):494-9. PubMed ID: 19289292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "How deeply hypnotized did i get?" Predicting self-reported hypnotic depth from a phenomenological assessment instrument.
    Pekala RJ; Kumar VK; Maurer R; Elliott-Carter NC; Moon E
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2006 Jul; 54(3):316-39. PubMed ID: 16858905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hypnotic susceptibility and the endogenous eyeblink: a brief communication.
    Lindsay S; Kurtz RM; Stern JA
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Apr; 41(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 8468106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failing to resist hypnotic test suggestions: a strategy for self-presenting as deeply hypnotized.
    Spanos NP; Cobb PC; Gorassini DR
    Psychiatry; 1985 Aug; 48(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 4034815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Was I hypnotized?: a social psychological analysis of hypnotic depth reports.
    Radtke HL; Spanos NP
    Psychiatry; 1981 Nov; 44(4):359-76. PubMed ID: 7027296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques.
    Szabó C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making hypnosis happen: the involuntariness of the hypnotic experience.
    Zamansky HS; Ruehle BL
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Oct; 43(4):386-98. PubMed ID: 7591340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of instructional set on attributions of nonvolition during hypnotic and nonhypnotic analgesia.
    Spanos NP; Katsanis J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1989 Feb; 56(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 2926621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relation of self-reports of hypnotic depth in self-hypnosis to hypnotizability and imagery production.
    Kahn SP; Fromm E; Lombard LS; Sossi M
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Oct; 37(4):290-304. PubMed ID: 2793270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hypnotic susceptibility and experimental pain reduction.
    Tenenbaum SJ; Kurtz RM; Bienias JL
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1990 Jul; 33(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 2220655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A preliminary phenomenological study of being hypnotized and hypnotizing.
    Woodard FJ
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Oct; 97(2):423-66. PubMed ID: 16342574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preferences for descriptors of hypnosis: a brief communication.
    Christensen CC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Jul; 53(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 16076665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cognitive demands of hypnotic response.
    Wyzenbeek M; Bryant RA
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2012; 60(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 22098570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of prior knowledge of hypnotic items on hypnotic performance and depth.
    Page RA; Handley GW
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1992 Oct; 35(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 1442645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of encoding in hypnosis and post-hypnotic suggestion on academic performance.
    Jacobson N; Kramer S; Tharp A; Costa S; Hawley P
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2011 Apr; 53(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 21598839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recurrence quantification analysis of electroencephalograph signals during standard tasks of Waterloo-Stanford group scale of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Yargholi E; Nasrabadi AM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2015 Jan; 39(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25367766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: form C.
    Moran TE; Kurtz RM; Strube MJ
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2002; 44(3-4):221-30. PubMed ID: 11799536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hypnotic depth and response to suggestion under standardized conditions and during FMRI scanning.
    Oakley DA; Deeley Q; Halligan PW
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2007 Jan; 55(1):32-58. PubMed ID: 17135062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the hypnotized subject lying?
    Kinnunen T; Zamansky HS; Block ML
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1994 May; 103(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 8040488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.