These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7145084)

  • 21. The role of perceptual reference frames in visual field asymmetries.
    Robertson LC; Lamb MR
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 3362340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reaction times to lateralized visual stimuli in callosal agenesis: stimulus and response factors.
    Milner AD; Jeeves MA; Silver PH; Lines CR; Wilson J
    Neuropsychologia; 1985; 23(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 4022301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Manual reaction time asymmetries in human subjects: the role of movement planning and attention.
    Barthelemy S; Boulinguez P
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Nov; 315(1-2):41-4. PubMed ID: 11711210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hemispheric asymmetry in reaction time to color stimuli.
    Pirot M; Pulton TW; Sutker LW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 2):1151-5. PubMed ID: 604893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of blurring and stimulus size on the lateralized processing of nonverbal stimuli.
    Michimata C; Hellige JB
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(2):397-407. PubMed ID: 3601044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hemispheric asymmetry in processing of verbal material by left-handers.
    Czachowska-Sieszycka B; Szelag E
    Physiol Bohemoslov; 1985; 34 Suppl():21-4. PubMed ID: 2941791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Left hemisphere contribution to motor programming of aphasic speech: a reaction time experiment in aphasic patients.
    Vallar G; Sterzi R; Basso A
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 3405397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cross-modal performance in patients with cerebral lesions.
    McNally C; Ettlinger G; Smith AM
    Cortex; 1982 Apr; 18(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 6197235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A right hemispatial field advantage on a verbal free-vision task.
    Levy J; Kueck L
    Brain Lang; 1986 Jan; 27(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 3947942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dissociation of hemifield reaction time differences from verbal stimulus directionality.
    Isseroff A; Carmon A; Nachshon I
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Jul; 103(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 4422703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laterality of cross-modal spatial processing.
    Adams JO; Duda PD
    Cortex; 1986 Dec; 22(4):539-52. PubMed ID: 3816239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finger-tapping interference as produced by concurrent verbal and nonverbal tasks: an analysis of individual differences in left-handers.
    Bathurst K; Kee DW
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Jan; 24(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 8123260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Left hemispheric advantage for a visuopatial-dichaptic matching task.
    Yandell L; Elias JW
    Cortex; 1983 Apr; 19(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 6851593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Right hemispheric dominance in gaze-triggered reflexive shift of attention in humans.
    Okada T; Sato W; Toichi M
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 16730869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can callosal speed of transmission be inferred from verbal reaction times?
    Amadeo M; Roemer RA; Shagass C
    Biol Psychiatry; 1977 Apr; 12(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 870097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new approach to cerebral asymmetry: RT differences in simultaneous bimanual finger movement during verbal and nonverbal tasks.
    Wünscher T; Jordan K; Gille HG; Roth N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 2342853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sex differences in verbal and visual-spatial tasks under different hemispheric visual-field presentation conditions.
    Boyle GJ; Neumann DL; Furedy JJ; Westbury HR
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Apr; 110(2):396-410. PubMed ID: 20499551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hemispheric differences in image generation and use in the haptic modality.
    Findlay R; Ashton R; McFarland K
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 8043267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visuospatial Asymmetries Arise from Differences in the Onset Time of Perceptual Evidence Accumulation.
    Newman DP; Loughnane GM; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(12):3378-3385. PubMed ID: 28242798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Vocal responses to left visual stimuli following forebrain commissurotomy.
    Johnson LE
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 6728179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.