416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7145247)
41. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
Hunter V; Tseng P
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Significance of cone biopsy margins in the management of patients with cervical neoplasia.
Lubicz S; Ezekweche C; Allen A; Schiffer M
J Reprod Med; 1984 Mar; 29(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 6726696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Rational use of cryosurgery and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Loizzi P; Carriero C; Di Gesù A; Resta L; Nappi R
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1992; 13(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 1473532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Correlation of colposcopically directed biopsy and conization with histologic diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Savage EW
J Reprod Med; 1975 Dec; 15(6):211-3. PubMed ID: 1195261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia where colposcopy is not available.
Omigbodun AO
Cent Afr J Med; 1991 Jan; 37(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 2060008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Cervical conization in dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Role of concomitant uterine curettage].
Kazadi Buanga J; Acosta Vazquez MJ
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Dec; 89(12):602-5. PubMed ID: 7846467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prediction of clearance of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by conization.
Ostergard DR
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jul; 56(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 7383491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Combination of cytology and colposcopy in diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Harahap RE
Cancer Detect Prev; 1981; 4(1-4):461-4. PubMed ID: 7349810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: the predictive value of conization margin status.
Young JL; Jazaeri AA; Lachance JA; Stoler MH; Irvin WP; Rice LW; Andersen WA; Modesitt SC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 197(2):195.e1-7; discussion 195.e7-8. PubMed ID: 17689647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The "unsatisfactory" colposcopic examination.
Rochelson B; Krumholz BA
J Reprod Med; 1983 Feb; 28(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 6834353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cervical crypt involvement by intraepithelial neoplasia.
Anderson MC; Hartley RB
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 55(5):546-50. PubMed ID: 7366912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Recurrent carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix (author's transl)].
Anastasiadis P; von Lüdinghausen M
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1979 Jun; 39(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 478259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Adequacy of conization margins in adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix as a predictor of residual disease.
Im DD; Duska LR; Rosenshein NB
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Nov; 59(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 7590468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Follow-up in cervix intra-epithelial neoplasia and condylomatous lesions of the uterine cervix].
Barten G
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 2316299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Carcinoma-in-situ of the cerivix treated with colposcopy guided epithelial conization. Report of a 4-7 year follow-up study.
Burrowes JT; Sengupta BS; Persaud V
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1976; 14(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 13018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Laser CO(2) conization: a safe mode of treating conservatively microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Diakomanolis E; Haidopoulos D; Rodolakis A; Vlachos G; Stefanidis K; Komisopoulos K; Michalas S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Apr; 113(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 15063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy in diagnosis of cervical neoplasia.
Srisomboon J; Tangchaitrong CA; Bhusawang Y; Chairatana A
J Med Assoc Thai; 1996 Jul; 79(7):423-8. PubMed ID: 8855620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
