These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. Boone JM; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1863-74. PubMed ID: 9434969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. Boone JM Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: dependence on anode material, breast thickness, and lesion type. Fahrig R; Yaffe MJ Med Phys; 1994 Sep; 21(9):1473-81. PubMed ID: 7838059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra. Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Nosratieh A; Boone JM Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28303582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calculated mammographic spectra confirmed with attenuation curves for molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten targets. Blough MM; Waggener RG; Payne WH; Terry JA Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1605-12. PubMed ID: 9775364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography. Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mean glandular dose coefficients (D(g)N) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems. Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ; Seibert JA; Boone JM Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7179-90. PubMed ID: 26348995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations. Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measured low-energy x-ray spectra of interest in diagnostic radiology and mammography. Hernandez-Guzman A; Moreno-Ramírez A; Massillon-Jl G Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36179707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling. Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncertainty estimation and statistical comparative methodology for mammography x-ray energy spectra. Santoro-Fernandes V; Santos JC; Mariano L; Vanin VR; Costa PR Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Apr; 6(3):035018. PubMed ID: 33438663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in mammography. Ng KP; Kwok CS; Tang FH Phys Med Biol; 2000 May; 45(5):1309-18. PubMed ID: 10843106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography. McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Catalog of x-ray spectra of Mo-, Rh-, and W-anode-based x-ray tubes from 10 to 50 kV. Ketelhut S; Büermann L; Hilgers G Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33902019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic range requirements in digital mammography. Maidment AD; Fahrig R; Yaffe MJ Med Phys; 1993; 20(6):1621-33. PubMed ID: 8309434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]