268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7146416)
1. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic mottle: a comprehensive theory.
Barnes GT
Med Phys; 1982; 9(5):656-67. PubMed ID: 7155067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noise transfer in screen-film subtraction radiography.
Shaw A; Moores BM
Phys Med Biol; 1985 Mar; 30(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 3885267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
Wojtasek DA; Teixidor HS; Govoni AF; Gareen IF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of mammographic screen-film systems.
Sickles EA
Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():52-7. PubMed ID: 3589132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
Oestmann JW; Kopans DB; Linetsky L; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; White G; Swann C; Kelley JE; Johnson LL
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Compatibility characteristics of five radiographic films utilised in Brazilian diagnostic radiology.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; de Almeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 23651656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Complex evaluation of film mammography imaging systems. I. Methodological principles].
Friedrich M; Weskamp P
Rofo; 1984 May; 140(5):585-96. PubMed ID: 6429765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems.
Rossi RP; Williams C; Gill D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Roe D; Orr J
Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 3310091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The technical support of mammography].
Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experimental study on image quality when using screens in mammography (author's transl)].
Maurer HJ; Goos F
Rofo; 1979 Mar; 130(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 155580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
