These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7148040)

  • 21. Perceived symmetry and visual matching.
    Hershenson M; Ryder J
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 7168458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attention alters visual plasticity during exposure-based learning.
    Gutnisky DA; Hansen BJ; Iliescu BF; Dragoi V
    Curr Biol; 2009 Apr; 19(7):555-60. PubMed ID: 19268592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Noise causes slant underestimation in stereo and motion.
    Ji H; Fermüller C
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3105-20. PubMed ID: 16750551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 3D surface orientation based on a novel representation of the orientation disparity field.
    Fantoni C
    Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(25):2509-22. PubMed ID: 18796310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Perception of line patterns under the influence of successive and simultaneous interference].
    Gerber A
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1980; 27(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 7385928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Role of gamma-band synchronization in priming of form discrimination for multiobject displays.
    Lu H; Morrison RG; Hummel JE; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):610-7. PubMed ID: 16822127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of speed lines in subtle direction judgments.
    Matthews N; Allen J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1629-40. PubMed ID: 15781078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Precision and accuracy of oculocentric direction for targets of different luminances.
    Bedell HE; Johnson MH; Barbeito R
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Aug; 38(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 4088805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptual sampling of orthogonal straight line features.
    Townsend JT; Hu GG; Ashby FG
    Psychol Res; 1981; 43(3):259-75. PubMed ID: 7323242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Describing perceptual information about human growth in terms of geometric invariants.
    Mark LS; Todd JT
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Mar; 37(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 4022756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Topological perception: holes in an experiment.
    Rubin JM; Kanwisher N
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Feb; 37(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 4011375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the mathematical form of psychophysical relationships, with special focus on the perception of mechanical properties of solid objects.
    Peleg M; Campanella OH
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Nov; 44(5):451-5. PubMed ID: 3226895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An experimental comparison of three- versus four-surface phenomenal transparency.
    Masin SC
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Apr; 35(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 6739267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Judging the location of features of naturalistic and geometric shapes.
    Greene SL; Plastow E; Braine LG
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Feb; 37(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 4011369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recognition models reevaluated: a response to Smith.
    Keren G; Baggen S
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Feb; 31(2):192-3. PubMed ID: 7079101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recognition models evaluated: a commentary on Keren and Baggen.
    Smith JE
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Feb; 31(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 7079099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Holistic versus analytic process models: a reply.
    Lockhead GR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):746-55. PubMed ID: 528971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Judging similarity among strings described by hierarchical trees.
    Lopes LL; Johnson MD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1982 Aug; 51(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 7136843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Density versus feature weights as predictors of visual identifications: comment on Appelman and Mayzner.
    Krumhansl CL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1982 Mar; 111(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 6460834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality.
    Tversky A; Gati I
    Psychol Rev; 1982 Mar; 89(2):123-54. PubMed ID: 7089125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.