BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7148833)

  • 1. Vitek v. Jones: transfer of prisoners to mental institutions.
    Gottlieb NR
    Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):175-207. PubMed ID: 7148833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants.
    Morris DR; Parker GF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parham v. J. R.: "voluntary" commitment of minors to mental institutions.
    Tiano LV
    Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(1):125-49. PubMed ID: 7435506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dubious delegation: Article III limits on mental health treatment decisions.
    Teitelbaum A
    Mich Law Rev; 2012 Jun; 110(8):1553-82. PubMed ID: 22708137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The privatization of the civil commitment process and the state action doctrine: have the mentally ill been systematically stripped of their Fourteenth Amendment rights?
    Brooks W
    Duquesne Law Rev; 2001; 40(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 16518904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. O'Connor v. Donaldson: retelling a classic and finding some revisionist history.
    Behnke SH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 10212031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?
    Linburn GE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
    Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power, uncertainty, and choice: the voluntary commitment of children--Parham v. J.L.
    Simet DP
    Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1982 May; 20(1):141-61. PubMed ID: 11658705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. And some grow mad, and all grow bad: prisoners' constitutional right to receive psychiatric treatment.
    Jennings EM
    N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1985; 11(1):160-85. PubMed ID: 16100811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential Effects of
    Hall TS
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CRIPA, Olmstead, and the transformation of the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board.
    Bloom JD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 22960921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
    Davoli JI
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supreme Court holds that children are not constitutionally entitled to pre-admission hearings prior to placement in psychiatric hospitals.
    Walker RL
    Clgh Rev; 1979 Nov; 13(6):513-5. PubMed ID: 11665119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vitek and beyond: the empirical context of prison-to-hospital transfers.
    Hartstone E; Steadman HJ; Monahan J
    Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):125-36. PubMed ID: 10262393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can parents "volunteer" their children into mental institutions: an analysis of Kremens v. Bartley and Parham v. J.L. and J.R.
    Ment Retard Law; 1978 Jan; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 11686183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prison transfer to mental institutions: the right to equal protection.
    Hart JC
    N D Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 49(4):815-34. PubMed ID: 11664215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.