These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7149000)
21. [The value of clinical examination methods in diagnosis of acoustic neuroma]. Scherler M; Böhmer A HNO; 1995 Aug; 43(8):487-91. PubMed ID: 7558906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acoustic neuroma; an audiologic evaluation. Cacace AT N Y State J Med; 1981 Apr; 81(5):744-9. PubMed ID: 7012713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Short-latency auditory evoked potentials in various pathologic conditions of the brain stem]. Pudov AI; Tereshchuk TI; Evstratova LI Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 1986; (4):39-43. PubMed ID: 3766008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials and blink reflexes in patients with pontocerebellar angle tumors. Nurlu G; Bavbek M; Colak A; Sarjbaş O; Ozgen T Neurosurg Rev; 1994; 17(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 7753412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contralateral auditory brainstem response abnormalities in acoustic neuroma. Moffat DA; Baguley DM; Hardy DG; Tsui YN J Laryngol Otol; 1989 Sep; 103(9):835-8. PubMed ID: 2584871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Auditory brain stem responses in the diagnosis of acoustic neurinoma (author's transl)]. Kashiwagi G; Kawamura S; Ichikawa G; Kohda M Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1980 Jun; 83(6):612-8. PubMed ID: 7463192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Contribution and Cost-Effectiveness of ABR and MRI in Acoustic Neuroma screening. Retrospective Study of 151 Cases]. Portier F; Herman P; Lot G; Tran Ba Huy P Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2002 Apr; 119(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12015490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficacy of auditory brainstem response as a screening test for small acoustic neuromas. Gordon ML; Cohen NL Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 8572110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Assessment of cochlear function with distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in acoustic neuroma]. Oeken J HNO; 1996 Dec; 44(12):677-84. PubMed ID: 9081952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. False-negative brainstem auditory evoked potential recordings in a case of multiple acoustic neuroma. Buettner UW; Thron A; Elies S; Grote E Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci; 1988 Sep; 237(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 3181221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The use of short-latency auditory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of acoustic neurinomas]. Baliazin VA; Bakhtin OM; Bu Khaled KhE; Filatova VS Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 1993; (3):9-12. PubMed ID: 8256549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Auditory brain stem responses in patients with central nervous disturbances (author's transl)]. Hosokawa S Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1979 Jan; 82(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 430281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Misleading auditory brainstem responses in a case of acoustic neuroma. Leggett JM; Reid A J Laryngol Otol; 1987 Feb; 101(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 3572221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]