These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7150173)

  • 1. Comparison of respirator protection factors measured by two quantitative fit test methods.
    Kolesar ES; Cosgrove DJ; de la Barre CM; Theis CF
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1982 Nov; 53(11):1116-22. PubMed ID: 7150173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Worst case" aerosol testing parameters: I. Sodium chloride and dioctyl phthalate aerosol filter efficiency as a function of particle size and flow rate.
    Stevens GA; Moyer ES
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 2729101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experiments supporting the use of ambient aerosols for quantitative respirator fit testing.
    Ernstberger HG; Gall RB; Turok CW
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Dec; 49(12):613-9. PubMed ID: 3213815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative respirator fit testing: dynamic pressure versus aerosol measurement.
    Carpenter DR; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Oct; 49(10):492-6. PubMed ID: 3189158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of qualitative and quantitative results from testing respirator fit.
    Hardis KE; Cadena CA; Carlson GJ; da Roza RA; Held BJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Feb; 44(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 6837444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
    Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Worst case" aerosol testing parameters: II. Efficiency dependence of commercial respirator filters on humidity pretreatment.
    Moyer ES; Stevens GA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 2729102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part III--Validation.
    Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 10386357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of saccharin qualitative fitting test for respirators.
    Marsh JL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Jun; 45(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 6741791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of aerosol size distribution and measurement method on respirator fit.
    Holton PM; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):855-60. PubMed ID: 3687730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Respirator protection factors: Part II-protection factors of supplied-air respirators.
    Hack AL; Bradley OD; Trujillo A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 May; 41(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 7415964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
    Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noninvasive, quantitative respirator fit testing through dynamic pressure measurement.
    Carpenter DR; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Oct; 49(10):485-91. PubMed ID: 3189157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a sodium chloride aerosol filter test method to silica-dust and silica-mist filter test methods.
    Lowry PL; Revoir WH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Sep; 39(9):709-16. PubMed ID: 215024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative fit testing of personnel utilizing a mouthpiece respirator.
    Packard LH; Brady HL; Schumm OF
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Sep; 39(9):723-30. PubMed ID: 727118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory and field evaluation of a new personal sampling system for assessing the protection provided by the N95 filtering facepiece respirators against particles.
    Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Li W; McKay R; Maynard A; Reponen T
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Apr; 49(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 15668259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative fit-test method for powered air-purifying respirators.
    Lowry PL; Wheat LD; Bustos JM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Apr; 40(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 474413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of test exercises and mask donning on measured respirator fit.
    Crutchfield CD; Fairbank EO; Greenstein SL
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 1999 Dec; 14(12):827-37. PubMed ID: 10633954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation in quantitative respirator fit factors due to fluctuations in leak size during fit testing.
    Krishnan U; Willeke K; Juozaitis A; Myojo T; Talaska G; Shukla R
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1994 Apr; 55(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 8209835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing.
    Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR; Zhuang Z
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):862-70. PubMed ID: 9866166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.